Environmental Science & Policy· 2026Q1
Characterizing meso-level organizations engaged in climate change adaptation work in Africa: A configurational analysis
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Two distinct configurations of meso-level organizations (MLOs) in sub-Saharan Africa, identified through latent profile analysis, are associated with different climate adaptation performance outcomes: a four-profile model showing higher capacity leads to better performance, and a six-profile model demonstrating equifinality where diverse configurations achieve comparable results.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Traditional sector-based typologies are insufficient for understanding meso-level organizations (MLOs) in sub-Saharan African climate adaptation.
- Latent profile analysis identified two models of MLO configurations: a four-profile model and a six-profile model.
- In the four-profile model, higher organizational capacity profiles were linked to significantly better performance outcomes.
- The six-profile model demonstrated equifinality, with diverse configurations achieving comparable performance levels.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Climate change adaptation in sub-Saharan Africa depends on the effectiveness of meso-level organizations (MLOs) in negotiating the needs of rural community beneficiaries and the aims of macro-level policy and finance actors. In this region, however, the traditional sector-based typology of organizations – public, private, non-profit – is insufficient to capture the complexity of MLOs tasked with activating and scaling climate adaptation. Further, it is unclear what type of MLOs are likely to be associated with more transformative climate adaptation performance outcomes. Building on a theoretical framework that posits nine MLO organizational sub-dimensions supporting climate adaptation, this paper takes a configurational approach to examine (1) whether distinct clusters of MLOs can be empirically identified based on the framework’s sub-dimensions, and (2) how clusters of MLOs are associated with different organizational performance outcomes. A configurational approach moves beyond additive account of independent organizational capacities and examines how interdependencies of organizational attributes contribute to organizational outcomes. Using survey data of MLOs in four sub-Saharan countries, latent profile analysis results show two acceptable models: a four-profile model characterized by a largely hierarchical ordering of organizational capacities, and a six-profile model reflecting more heterogeneous configurations. In the four-profile model, higher-capacity profiles report significantly better performance outcomes. In the six-profile model, two profiles are at the opposite extremes, while other configurations achieve comparable levels of performance, showing evidence for equifinality. These findings further validate the theoretical framework and highlight the importance of our approach in explaining how organizations can enable climate adaptation outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Environmental Science & Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsAgricultural and Biological Sciences