Computer Assisted Language Learning· 2026Q1
Navigating the (dis)connect: advancing equitable and inclusive practices in Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL)
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A thematic analysis of the 2025 International CALL Research Conference proceedings reveals a strong focus on skills development and personalization, but a significant neglect of structural barriers like device poverty, linguistic marginalization, and data privacy concerns.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- CALL research heavily emphasizes skills development, personalization, and engagement.
- Structural barriers like device poverty, linguistic marginalization, and data privacy are significantly underexplored in current CALL scholarship.
- The MAST framework (Motivation, Access, Skills, Trust) was used to analyze conference proceedings.
- The paper argues for a shift from techno-solutionist to contextually grounded, justice-oriented CALL models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This paper explores the potential of digital technologies to foster equitable and inclusive practices in Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) within a postdigital context, where digital and analog modalities are increasingly entangled (Bhatt & Gourlay, Fawns, Citation2019; Knox, Citation2019). While CALL has long been associated with widening access and participation, persistent inequalities in digital access, skills, motivation, and trust continue to constrain its transformative potential (Tafazoli, Citation2025). Responding to these concerns, the 2025 International CALL Research Conference foregrounded Inclusive CALL as a key theme (Wang, Moore et al., 2025). Drawing on the New Zealand Digital Inclusion Blueprint and its four interrelated dimensions namely; Motivation, Access, Skills, and Trust (MAST) (New Zealand Government, Citation2021), this paper critically examines how digital inclusion is conceptualised and represented in the Inclusive CALL proceedings. The analysis is theoretically informed by postdigital theory and ecological models of inclusive CALL (Tafazoli et al., Citation2025), offering a lens to interrogate the sociocultural, infrastructural, and more-than-digital conditions shaping CALL environments. Using the MAST framework as an analytic lens, a deductive thematic analysis of the 2025 conference proceedings highlights dominant research emphases and underexplored areas. Findings suggest that while the scholarship analysed strongly foregrounds skills development, personalization, and engagement, comparatively little attention is paid to structural barriers such as device poverty, linguistic marginalization, and concerns around trust, data privacy, and surveillance. The paper argues for a shift away from techno-solutionist approaches toward contextually grounded, justice-oriented, and participatory models of inclusive CALL, and proposes a postdigital framework to guide future research, pedagogy, and policy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Literature and Literary Theory
Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities