The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics· 2026Q1
Counterexamples to Generalizations of the Erdős $B+B+t$ Problem
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
New counterexamples disprove generalizations of the Erdős $B+B+t$ problem, showing that infinite sets with high multiplicative or additive density do not necessarily contain specific product or polynomial configurations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Counterexamples are provided for generalizations of the Erdős $B+B+t$ problem concerning infinite configurations.
- A set $A \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ with multiplicative upper Banach density $\ge 1 - \varepsilon$ is shown to not contain {b1b2t : b1, b2 \in B, b1 \ne b2} for infinite B and t \in \mathbb{Q}_{>0}.
- A set $A \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ with additive upper Banach density $\ge 1 - \varepsilon$ is shown to not contain {b1^2 + b2 + t : b1, b2 \in B, b1 < b2} for infinite B and t \in \mathbb{Z}.
- The constructions are based on Ernst Straus's work.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Following their resolution of the Erdős $B+B+t$ problem, Kra, Moreira, Richter, and Robertson posed a number of questions and conjectures related to infinite configurations in positive density subsets of the integers and other amenable groups. We give a negative answer to several of their questions and conjectures by producing families of counterexamples based on a construction of Ernst Straus.Included among our counterexamples, we exhibit, for any $\varepsilon > 0$, a set $A \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ with multiplicative upper Banach density at least $1 - \varepsilon$ such that $A$ does not contain any dilated product set $\{b_1b_2t : b_1, b_2 \in B, b_1 \ne b_2\}$ for an infinite set $B \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ and $t \in \mathbb{Q}_{>0}$. We also prove the existence of a set $A \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ with additive upper Banach density at least $1 - \varepsilon$ such that $A$ does not contain any polynomial configuration $\{b_1^2 + b_2 + t : b_1, b_2 \in B, b_1 < b_2\}$ for an infinite set $B \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ and $t \in \mathbb{Z}$. Counterexamples to some closely related problems are also discussed.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Mathematical Physics
Mathematical PhysicsMathematics