BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care· 2026Q1
Comparison of ketamine versus lignocaine intravenous infusion in refractory cancer pain: a prospective randomised double-blind controlled study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Intravenous ketamine (84.8%) and lignocaine (72.7%) provided comparable pain relief in refractory cancer pain, but lignocaine had significantly fewer adverse effects (9.1% vs 30.3%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Effective pain relief was achieved in 84.8% of patients receiving ketamine infusions and 72.7% receiving lignocaine infusions for refractory cancer pain.
- Both ketamine and lignocaine infusions significantly reduced opioid requirements.
- Adverse effects were significantly more frequent in the ketamine group (30.3%) compared to the lignocaine group (9.1%).
- Acute pain crises were numerically more common in the ketamine group (42.9%) but not statistically significant compared to lignocaine (29.2%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic efficacy, adverse effect profile, incidence of acute pain crises and opioid-sparing effects of intravenous ketamine versus lignocaine infusions in patients with refractory cancer pain. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted at Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute (October 2023-January 2025). 66 adults with refractory cancer pain, defined as pain inadequately controlled despite an oral morphine equivalent (OME) dose exceeding 200 mg/day, were randomised equally to receive either intravenous ketamine (0.3 mg/kg/hour) or intravenous lignocaine (2 mg/kg/hour), each administered as two 6-hour infusions separated by 12 hours. The primary outcome was effective pain relief, defined as a ≥50% reduction in pain severity. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, acute pain crises during 6-week follow-up and postinfusion changes in OME dose. RESULTS: Effective pain relief was achieved in 84.8% of the ketamine group and 72.7% of the lignocaine group (p=0.228). Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in OME dose from baseline (p<0.01 for both), with no significant between-group difference (p=0.738). Adverse effects were significantly more frequent with ketamine than lignocaine (30.3% vs 9.1%; p=0.03). Acute pain crises during follow-up were numerically more common in the ketamine group (42.9% vs 29.2%), though this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.307). CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine and lignocaine demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effects in refractory cancer pain. Lignocaine, however, offers a more favourable safety profile with significantly fewer adverse effects, supporting its consideration as a preferred option in this clinical setting.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineMedicine