PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging· 2026Q1

Limbic Structural Alterations and Structural Covariance Across Prodromal Phenotypes and Early Parkinson's Disease

Yuanyuan Zhao, Luoyu Wang, Yihan Suo, Maoling Liu et al.

Short summary

Brain scans reveal distinct limbic structural alterations in prodromal Parkinson's disease (PD) phenotypes, with hyposmia-related groups showing greater involvement of olfactory and Papez circuit regions compared to RBD-only groups.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Significant limbic structural alterations were observed in prodromal Parkinson's disease (PD) phenotypes.
  • The insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and left parahippocampal gyrus showed volume reductions across groups.
  • Strongest negative linear trends in volume were found in the orbitofrontal cortex and left parahippocampal gyrus.
  • Hyposmia-related phenotypes exhibited more extensive involvement of olfactory and Papez circuit regions compared to RBD-only phenotypes.
  • Structural covariance analyses revealed phenotype-specific differences in limbic network patterns.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-motor symptoms may precede motor diagnosis in Parkinson's disease (PD), but whether distinct prodromal phenotypes exhibit differential limbic structural alterations remains unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate limbic structural alterations across prodromal PD phenotypes defined by rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and/or hyposmia. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cross-sectional study. POPULATION/SUBJECTS: 315 age- and sex-matched participants (mean age = 68.34 years; 233 men and 82 women): healthy controls (HC), prodromal RBD without hyposmia, hyposmia without RBD/dream-enactment behavior, hyposmia with RBD/dream-enactment behavior, and untreated PD (n = 63/group). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T sagittal T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE or equivalent sequences; nominal slice thickness = 1.0 mm; in-plane resolution = 1.0 × 1.0 mm; matrix = 256 × 256; FOV = 256 mm. ASSESSMENT: Volumes of 34 limbic regions were extracted using FreeSurfer and ScLimbic, normalized to estimated total intracranial volume, and harmonized with ComBat. STATISTICAL TESTS: One-way ANCOVA, post hoc comparisons, trend analyses, rank-based partial correlations, and structural covariance analyses. False discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: After FDR correction, significant group differences were mainly observed in the insula (left: 5.20 ± 1.74, 4.64 ± 1.77, 4.48 ± 1.50, 4.03 ± 1.30, 3.92 ± 2.14; right: 5.26 ± 1.74, 4.56 ± 2.00, 4.30 ± 1.47, 3.95 ± 1.43, 3.89 ± 2.36), orbitofrontal cortex (left: 9.46 ± 2.82, 8.48 ± 3.42, 7.63 ± 3.17, 7.38 ± 3.03, 6.63 ± 3.79; right: 9.37 ± 2.89, 8.51 ± 3.33, 7.85 ± 3.05, 7.16 ± 2.74, 6.97 ± 3.89), and left parahippocampal gyrus (1.56 ± 0.77, 1.56 ± 0.72, 1.29 ± 0.70, 1.10 ± 0.59, 0.97 ± 1.03). Across exploratory phenotype orderings, the strongest negative linear trends were observed in the orbitofrontal cortex (left: β = -0.319 and -0.287; right: β = -0.297 and -0.266), and left parahippocampal gyrus (β = -0.297 and -0.268). Within-group covariance maps revealed phenotype-specific significant covariance patterns involving olfactory-related and Papez circuit regions after FDR correction. DATA CONCLUSION: Limbic structural alterations differed across prodromal phenotypes. Hyposmia-related phenotypes showed more extensive involvement of olfactory-related and Papez circuit brain regions than RBD, while structural covariance patterns suggest phenotype-specific differences in limbic structures. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Neurology (Medicine)

NeurologyMedicine