International Wound Journal· 2026Q1· Review
How Are Support Surfaces Used in Pressure Ulcer Care Within Nursing Home Settings Assessed? A Scoping Review
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A scoping review of 68 studies found that research on support surfaces for pressure ulcer care in nursing homes overwhelmingly prioritizes effectiveness and efficiency (78%) over user satisfaction (10%) or context of use (12%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 78% of 40 support surface evaluations focused on effectiveness or efficiency, while only 12% assessed context of use and 10% user satisfaction.
- Residents' perspectives were included in 42.5% of studies, and quality of life in 25%.
- Mattresses were the most common support surface evaluated (47% of 188).
- Industry funding was the most common source (37%) and research was concentrated among seven teams (49%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to synthesise evaluative research on support surfaces in pressure ulcer care in nursing homes, by examining how studies address effectiveness, efficiency, user satisfaction and context of use. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, six databases were used. Studies assessing support surfaces in nursing homes were included. Data extraction covered studies' characteristics, support surfaces evaluated and methodologies employed. Among the 68 included studies, 40 focused primarily on support surface evaluation, mainly assessing effectiveness or efficiency (n = 31, 78%) rather than context of use (n = 5, 12%) or user satisfaction (n = 4, 10%). Residents' perspectives were captured in 42.5% (n = 17) of studies and quality of life in 25% (n = 10), with one qualitative study identified. Mattresses predominated among the 188 support surfaces evaluated (47%, n = 88). Studies were concentrated among seven research teams (49%, n = 33), and industry funding was the most common source overall (37%, n = 25). Current research prioritises effectiveness and efficiency assessment over holistic usability assessment. The limited incorporation of residents' and professionals' experiences and quality of life outcomes reveals a gap between biomedical approaches and person-centred perspectives. Future research should place residents' and professionals' experiences at the centre of support surface evaluation to generate clinically relevant and ethically grounded evidence.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Wound Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Occupational Therapy
Occupational TherapyHealth Professions