Journal of Clinical Nursing· 2026Q1
Physical Labour, Dignity Preservation, and Weight Stigma in Nurses' Care for Larger‐Bodied Patients in Acute Care Settings: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Nurses' care for larger-bodied patients in acute settings intensifies physical labor and challenges dignity preservation due to mismatches in equipment, staffing, space, and workflows, contributing to weight stigma.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Care for larger-bodied patients is more physically demanding, safety-sensitive, and team-dependent due to system limitations.
- Mismatches between patient needs and standardized systems (equipment, staffing, space, workflows) challenge dignity preservation.
- These system-level issues contribute to implicit weight stigma, including blame and 'othering' of patients.
- Nurses employ strategies like respectful communication and adaptive care to resist stigma.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Acute care systems serve patients across a wide range of body sizes. For some larger‐bodied patients, nursing care may become more physically demanding when body size and mobility needs interact with limitations in equipment, staffing, space, and workflows. These conditions may also challenge dignity preservation and contribute to weight stigma. Aim To synthesize qualitative evidence on nurses' experiences of caring for larger‐bodied adults described in the source literature using obesity‐related classifications in acute care settings, and to examine how physical labour, dignity preservation, and weight stigma intersect in practice. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 15 April 2026. Eligible qualitative studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data were synthesized using Thomas and Harden's three‐stage thematic synthesis. Results Eleven reports representing 10 independent studies were included. Four analytical themes and 12 subthemes were generated: amplified physical labour; the non‐standard body within standardized systems; fragile dignity preservation; and the clinicalisation of weight stigma. Care became more physically intensive, safety‐sensitive, and team‐dependent when body size and mobility needs exceeded the capacity of standard equipment, staffing arrangements, space, and workflows. These system‐level mismatches could also increase exposure, constrain dignity‐preserving care, and contribute to blame, othering, and implicit weight stigma. Nurses also described efforts to resist stigma through respectful communication, collaboration, perspective taking, and adaptive care. Conclusion Physical labour, dignity preservation, and weight stigma are interrelated dimensions of acute nursing care for larger‐bodied patients. Safer and more equitable care requires size‐inclusive systems, appropriate equipment, adequate staffing, flexible workflows, and respectful body‐size‐sensitive communication. No Patient or Public Contribution This study is a meta‐synthesis and does not require relevant contributions from patients or the public.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pharmacy
PharmacyHealth Professions