PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Nano clay mitigation of wind induced soil loss across aggregate sizes through wind tunnel experiments and explainable machine learning

Abdirashid Ali Wehliye, Sema Kaplan

Short summary

Nano-clay application significantly reduced wind-induced soil loss by up to 95.9% across aggregate sizes, with the highest protective effect observed at 3.75 g m⁻².

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Nano-clay application reduced wind-induced soil loss by up to 95.9% across aggregate sizes (0.5-2.0 mm).
  • The highest protective effect was achieved with a nano-clay rate of 3.75 g m⁻².
  • Protective effects were more pronounced at high wind speeds and with finer aggregates.
  • An XGBoost model predicted soil loss with R² = 0.882, identifying nano-clay dose as the primary predictor.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate, under wind-tunnel conditions, the effects of different nano-clay application rates (0, 0.94, 1.88, and 3.75 g m⁻²) on wind-induced soil loss across different aggregate sizes (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm) and wind speeds (8, 10, and 12 m s⁻¹). In addition, the study aimed to model wind-induced soil loss processes using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence methods. The wind-tunnel experiments revealed that nano-clay applications significantly reduced soil loss across all aggregate sizes and wind-speed conditions. The highest protective effect was obtained at the 3.75 g m⁻² nano-clay rate; soil loss decreased by 80.8% in the 2 mm aggregates, by 93.2% in the 1 mm aggregates, and by 95.9% in the 0.5 mm aggregates. The protective effect of the nano-clay applications was found to be particularly pronounced at high wind speeds and in fine aggregates. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost showed the strongest development-stage performance under repeated nested group-aware cross-validation (R² = 0.835 ± 0.064, RMSE = 11.896 ± 2.229, MAE = 6.686 ± 0.854) and was selected before independent holdout evaluation. On the group-held-out test set, the selected XGBoost model achieved R² = 0.882, RMSE = 13.298, and MAE = 9.443. The lower performance of the linear baseline suggested that the tree-based models captured predictive structure not adequately represented by a simple linear formulation. SHAP analysis indicated that nano-clay dose made the largest mean absolute contribution to the fitted model predictions, followed by wind speed and aggregate size. Overall, nano-clay substantially reduced wind-induced soil loss within the controlled experimental conditions examined here; broader practical applicability requires validation under field conditions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Earth-Surface ProcessesEarth and Planetary Sciences