Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
Nano clay mitigation of wind induced soil loss across aggregate sizes through wind tunnel experiments and explainable machine learning
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Nano-clay application significantly reduced wind-induced soil loss by up to 95.9% across aggregate sizes, with the highest protective effect observed at 3.75 g m⁻².
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Nano-clay application reduced wind-induced soil loss by up to 95.9% across aggregate sizes (0.5-2.0 mm).
- The highest protective effect was achieved with a nano-clay rate of 3.75 g m⁻².
- Protective effects were more pronounced at high wind speeds and with finer aggregates.
- An XGBoost model predicted soil loss with R² = 0.882, identifying nano-clay dose as the primary predictor.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate, under wind-tunnel conditions, the effects of different nano-clay application rates (0, 0.94, 1.88, and 3.75 g m⁻²) on wind-induced soil loss across different aggregate sizes (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm) and wind speeds (8, 10, and 12 m s⁻¹). In addition, the study aimed to model wind-induced soil loss processes using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence methods. The wind-tunnel experiments revealed that nano-clay applications significantly reduced soil loss across all aggregate sizes and wind-speed conditions. The highest protective effect was obtained at the 3.75 g m⁻² nano-clay rate; soil loss decreased by 80.8% in the 2 mm aggregates, by 93.2% in the 1 mm aggregates, and by 95.9% in the 0.5 mm aggregates. The protective effect of the nano-clay applications was found to be particularly pronounced at high wind speeds and in fine aggregates. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost showed the strongest development-stage performance under repeated nested group-aware cross-validation (R² = 0.835 ± 0.064, RMSE = 11.896 ± 2.229, MAE = 6.686 ± 0.854) and was selected before independent holdout evaluation. On the group-held-out test set, the selected XGBoost model achieved R² = 0.882, RMSE = 13.298, and MAE = 9.443. The lower performance of the linear baseline suggested that the tree-based models captured predictive structure not adequately represented by a simple linear formulation. SHAP analysis indicated that nano-clay dose made the largest mean absolute contribution to the fitted model predictions, followed by wind speed and aggregate size. Overall, nano-clay substantially reduced wind-induced soil loss within the controlled experimental conditions examined here; broader practical applicability requires validation under field conditions.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Earth-Surface ProcessesEarth and Planetary Sciences