PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international· 2026Q2

Disease Name Recognition and Prognosis in Older Patients With Heart Failure

Tatsuro Tasaka, Makoto Saito, Megumi Hamada, Masaki Kinoshita et al.

Short summary

38% of older hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients (n=188, median age 81) failed to recognize their primary diagnosis before discharge, but this lack of recognition was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (mortality/hospitalization) after adjusting for age, cognition, and HF severity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 38% (72 of 188) of older hospitalized heart failure patients failed to recognize their primary diagnosis.
  • Lack of diagnosis recognition was associated with lower communicative and critical health literacy (CCHL) scores.
  • Disease recognition was not an independent determinant of all-cause mortality or hospitalization after adjustment for age, cognitive function, and HF severity.
  • Recognition accuracy showed high interobserver reliability (κ = 0.85).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Health literacy is considered a prognostic determinant for patients with heart failure (HF), and the recognition of disease names could be fundamental to this. This study examined the proportion of patients with HF who recognized their disease name and its association with prognosis. Methods From January 2021 to June 2023, 188 hospitalized patients with HF (Stage B–D, median age 81 years) were asked to recall their disease name before discharge. Recognition accuracy was evaluated using a standardized scoring system, and interobserver agreement was confirmed. In a subset, communicative and critical health literacy (CCHL) was assessed. Prognostic outcomes included all‐cause mortality and all‐cause hospitalization after discharge. Results The recognition score showed high interobserver reliability ( κ = 0.85). Seventy‐two patients (38%) failed to recognize their primary diagnosis. Those without recognition had significantly lower CCHL scores than those with recognition ( p < 0.01). During a median follow‐up of 280 days, 76 patients (40%) experienced adverse events. In univariate analyses, lack of diagnosis recognition was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, but this association disappeared after adjustment for age, cognitive function, and HF severity. Conclusion A substantial number of older patients with HF did not recognize their primary diagnosis, but disease recognition was not an independent determinant of prognosis.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Health Professions

General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions