PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2012Q1

Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes

Michael E. Farkouh, Michaël Domanski, Lynn A. Sleeper, Flora S. Siami et al.

Short summary

Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) significantly reduced rates of death and myocardial infarction compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CABG reduced the composite outcome of death, MI, or stroke by 26.6% vs. 18.7% over 5 years in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.
  • The benefit of CABG was primarily due to significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction and death.
  • Stroke rates were higher in the CABG group (5.2%) compared to the PCI group (2.4%).
  • All patients received optimal medical therapy for cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In some randomized trials comparing revascularization strategies for patients with diabetes, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has had a better outcome than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to discover whether aggressive medical therapy and the use of drug-eluting stents could alter the revascularization approach for patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: In this randomized trial, we assigned patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease to undergo either PCI with drug-eluting stents or CABG. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (median among survivors, 3.8 years). All patients were prescribed currently recommended medical therapies for the control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and glycated hemoglobin. The primary outcome measure was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. RESULTS: From 2005 through 2010, we enrolled 1900 patients at 140 international centers. The patients' mean age was 63.1±9.1 years, 29% were women, and 83% had three-vessel disease. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in the PCI group (P=0.005), with 5-year rates of 26.6% in the PCI group and 18.7% in the CABG group. The benefit of CABG was driven by differences in rates of both myocardial infarction (P<0.001) and death from any cause (P=0.049). Stroke was more frequent in the CABG group, with 5-year rates of 2.4% in the PCI group and 5.2% in the CABG group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with diabetes and advanced coronary artery disease, CABG was superior to PCI in that it significantly reduced rates of death and myocardial infarction, with a higher rate of stroke. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; FREEDOM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00086450.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Surgery

SurgeryMedicine