New England Journal of Medicine· 2012Q1
Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes
- 1,908citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) significantly reduced rates of death and myocardial infarction compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- CABG reduced the composite outcome of death, MI, or stroke by 26.6% vs. 18.7% over 5 years in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.
- The benefit of CABG was primarily due to significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction and death.
- Stroke rates were higher in the CABG group (5.2%) compared to the PCI group (2.4%).
- All patients received optimal medical therapy for cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In some randomized trials comparing revascularization strategies for patients with diabetes, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has had a better outcome than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to discover whether aggressive medical therapy and the use of drug-eluting stents could alter the revascularization approach for patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: In this randomized trial, we assigned patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease to undergo either PCI with drug-eluting stents or CABG. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (median among survivors, 3.8 years). All patients were prescribed currently recommended medical therapies for the control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and glycated hemoglobin. The primary outcome measure was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. RESULTS: From 2005 through 2010, we enrolled 1900 patients at 140 international centers. The patients' mean age was 63.1±9.1 years, 29% were women, and 83% had three-vessel disease. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in the PCI group (P=0.005), with 5-year rates of 26.6% in the PCI group and 18.7% in the CABG group. The benefit of CABG was driven by differences in rates of both myocardial infarction (P<0.001) and death from any cause (P=0.049). Stroke was more frequent in the CABG group, with 5-year rates of 2.4% in the PCI group and 5.2% in the CABG group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with diabetes and advanced coronary artery disease, CABG was superior to PCI in that it significantly reduced rates of death and myocardial infarction, with a higher rate of stroke. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; FREEDOM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00086450.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Surgery
SurgeryMedicine