PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Geoforum· 2026Q1

The material-affective politics of space: clock towers in Menemen, Turkey

Gülsüm Baydar, İlke Hıçsönmezler

Short summary

Clock towers recently erected in Menemen, Turkey, are analyzed as material-discursive and affective phenomena that shape urban space through references to Ottoman-Islamic heritage, reflecting broader conservative and populist governance strategies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Clock towers in Menemen, Turkey, are recent urban embellishments referencing Ottoman-Islamic heritage.
  • These towers are analyzed as material-discursive and affective phenomena shaped by architectural form, governance, and local context.
  • The study uses new materialist and affect-oriented approaches, based on field observations and interviews.
  • Clock towers generated uneven, politically differentiated responses from residents.
  • The affective impact of urban symbolism arises from its material entanglements with everyday life.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article examines the recent proliferation of clock towers in Menemen, Turkey, situating them within broader conservative and populist efforts to reshape urban space through references to Ottoman-Islamic heritage under the Justice and Development Party (JDP) rule. Erected as urban embellishments, the towers were intended to cultivate atmospheres of historical continuity, prestige, and civic attachment through architectural references to an imperial past. Drawing on new materialist and affect-oriented approaches, we conceptualize the clock towers as material-discursive and affective phenomena that take shape through the intra-action of architectural form, governance strategies, embodied practices, infrastructural conditions, and local histories. Based on field observations, municipal documents, and conversations with local administrators and residents, we demonstrate how the towers generated uneven, politically differentiated responses, and argue that the affective capacities of urban symbolism emerge through material entanglements with everyday life. The Menemen case reveals the dynamic relationship between intended affects, i.e.,those governmental interventions seek to cultivate, and those that take shape through the situated relations of everyday life. It contributes to wider debates on affective atmospheres, populist urbanism, and the material politics of space by foregrounding the contingent relationship between governmental affective intentions and everyday material engagements.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Geoforum, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Urban Studies

Urban StudiesSocial Sciences