New England Journal of Medicine· 2013Q1
Urinary-Cell mRNA Profile and Acute Cellular Rejection in Kidney Allografts
- 365citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2013year
Short summary
A three-gene mRNA signature (CD3ε, IP-10, 18S rRNA) in urinary cells accurately diagnoses acute cellular rejection in kidney transplant recipients, achieving an AUC of 0.85 in primary validation and 0.74 in external validation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A three-gene mRNA signature (CD3ε, IP-10, 18S rRNA) in urinary cells can diagnose acute cellular rejection in kidney allografts.
- The signature achieved an AUC of 0.85 in primary validation and 0.74 in external validation.
- The signature accurately distinguished acute cellular rejection from antibody-mediated rejection and borderline rejection (AUC 0.78).
- Urinary tract infections did not affect the diagnostic accuracy of the signature.
- The signature showed a predictive rise in levels preceding biopsy-confirmed acute cellular rejection.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The standard test for the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplants is the renal biopsy. Noninvasive tests would be preferable. METHODS: We prospectively collected 4300 urine specimens from 485 kidney-graft recipients from day 3 through month 12 after transplantation. Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were measured in urinary cells and correlated with allograft-rejection status with the use of logistic regression. RESULTS: A three-gene signature of 18S ribosomal (rRNA)-normalized measures of CD3ε mRNA and interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18S rRNA discriminated between biopsy specimens showing acute cellular rejection and those not showing rejection (area under the curve [AUC], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 by receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis). The cross-validation estimate of the AUC was 0.83 by bootstrap resampling, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good fit (P=0.77). In an external-validation data set, the AUC was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.86; P<0.001) and did not differ significantly from the AUC in our primary data set (P=0.13). The signature distinguished acute cellular rejection from acute antibody-mediated rejection and borderline rejection (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.89; P<0.001). It also distinguished patients who received anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies from those who received T-cell-depleting antibodies (P<0.001) and was diagnostic of acute cellular rejection in both groups. Urinary tract infection did not affect the signature (P=0.69). The average trajectory of the signature in repeated urine samples remained below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the group of patients with no rejection, but in the group with rejection, there was a sharp rise during the weeks before the biopsy showing rejection (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A molecular signature of CD3ε mRNA, IP-10 mRNA, and 18S rRNA levels in urinary cells appears to be diagnostic and prognostic of acute cellular rejection in kidney allografts. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Transplantation
TransplantationMedicine