Discover Sustainability· 2026Q1
Determinants of climate-resilient irrigation practices uptake among smallholder onion farmers in Laikipia Central Subcounty, Kenya
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Only 13.95% of smallholder onion farmers in Laikipia Central Subcounty, Kenya, have adopted climate-resilient irrigation practices (CRIPs) like drip, sprinkler, or rain hose, with 56.05% still using traditional furrow irrigation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Only 13.95% of smallholder onion farmers in Laikipia Central Subcounty have adopted climate-resilient irrigation practices (CRIPs).
- Sprinkler irrigation has the highest uptake (12.63%) among CRIPs, followed by rain hose (11.84%) and drip (5.53%).
- Climate change awareness, extension visits, and onion income positively influence adoption of all CRIPs.
- Factors like education, group membership, off-farm income, farm size, household size, credit, sex, and distance to farm/market influence specific CRIP adoption.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Climate-resilient irrigation practices (CRIPs) defined here as drip, sprinkler, and rain hose irrigation are essential for sustaining smallholder agricultural productivity in semi-arid regions of Kenya, where water scarcity limits crop output. Despite their benefits, uptake of CRIPs among smallholder onion farmers in Laikipia Central Subcounty remains low, with 56.05% still relying on traditional furrow irrigation. Sprinkler irrigation had the highest uptake (12.63%), followed by rain hose (11.84%) and drip irrigation (5.53%); combined adoption of CRIPs accounted for the remaining 13.95%. Data were collected from 380 smallholder onion farmers selected through multistage sampling, using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. The Multivariate Probit model revealed that determinants of uptake varied across the three irrigation practices. Climate change awareness, extension visits, and onion income were positively associated with all three practices. Education and group membership were positively associated with drip and rain hose adoption; off-farm income was positively associated with sprinkler and rain hose; while farm size was negatively associated with both. Technology-specific effects included household size and credit amount being positively associated with drip; sex and distance to farm being negatively associated with sprinkler; and years of Water Resource Users Association membership was positively associated with rain hose, while age and distance to market were negatively associated with rain hose irrigation. The study recommends targeted subsidies and harvest-aligned credit channelled through farmer groups to promote drip irrigation uptake; pay-as-you-go solar pump financing to address energy and liquidity constraints for sprinkler irrigation and for rain hose irrigation, strengthened agro-dealer stock support, spare-parts distribution, and local technician training, complemented by Water Resource Users Association linked water scheduling and Village Savings and Loan Associations based purchase plans to improve affordability and accessibility.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Discover Sustainability, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Soil Science
Soil ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences