Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
Energy and spectral indicators support screening for soil structure interaction sensitivity in steel moment frames
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Energy-based flexibility indices and spectral information can screen for soil-structure interaction (SSI) sensitivity in steel moment frames, though performance varies across different seismic events and soil conditions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A screening method was developed using energy-based flexibility indices and spectral information to prioritize SSI-sensitive steel moment frames.
- Larger translational and rocking flexibility contributions were linked to greater absolute drift changes.
- Spectral information improved the directional interpretation of SSI effects.
- A frozen model tested on new records achieved an RMSE of 0.0191 and a balanced accuracy of 0.628 for spectral-eligible cases.
- The screening performance was not uniformly transferable across different seismic events and soil conditions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Soil–structure interaction (SSI) can increase or decrease seismic demand depending on structural, foundation, and ground-motion characteristics. This study evaluates whether SSI-sensitive cases in steel special moment-resisting frames can be prioritized using energy-based flexibility indices and record-specific spectral information. Three 4-, 8-, and 16-story frames were analyzed under five far-field records, three intensity levels, and three soil-stiffness levels, yielding 180 nonlinear analyses and 135 fixed-base/SSI comparisons. Larger translational and rocking flexibility contributions were associated with larger absolute drift changes, while spectral information improved directional interpretation within the development data. A frozen model was then tested without recalibration on 17 additional FEMA P695 records, adding 204 analyses. For 81 spectral-eligible comparisons from 10 independent new events, the combined model yielded an RMSE of 0.0191, a sign balanced accuracy of 0.628, and a three-class balanced accuracy of 0.514, and did not outperform a zero-change baseline in continuous RMSE. Thus, the indices retain value for mechanistic interpretation and within-domain prioritization, but the fitted coefficients and screening performance are not uniformly transferable. The framework is therefore a screening heuristic, not a substitute for direct nonlinear SSI analysis.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Civil and Structural Engineering
Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering