PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Energy and spectral indicators support screening for soil structure interaction sensitivity in steel moment frames

Hamid Mortezaie

Short summary

Energy-based flexibility indices and spectral information can screen for soil-structure interaction (SSI) sensitivity in steel moment frames, though performance varies across different seismic events and soil conditions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A screening method was developed using energy-based flexibility indices and spectral information to prioritize SSI-sensitive steel moment frames.
  • Larger translational and rocking flexibility contributions were linked to greater absolute drift changes.
  • Spectral information improved the directional interpretation of SSI effects.
  • A frozen model tested on new records achieved an RMSE of 0.0191 and a balanced accuracy of 0.628 for spectral-eligible cases.
  • The screening performance was not uniformly transferable across different seismic events and soil conditions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Soil–structure interaction (SSI) can increase or decrease seismic demand depending on structural, foundation, and ground-motion characteristics. This study evaluates whether SSI-sensitive cases in steel special moment-resisting frames can be prioritized using energy-based flexibility indices and record-specific spectral information. Three 4-, 8-, and 16-story frames were analyzed under five far-field records, three intensity levels, and three soil-stiffness levels, yielding 180 nonlinear analyses and 135 fixed-base/SSI comparisons. Larger translational and rocking flexibility contributions were associated with larger absolute drift changes, while spectral information improved directional interpretation within the development data. A frozen model was then tested without recalibration on 17 additional FEMA P695 records, adding 204 analyses. For 81 spectral-eligible comparisons from 10 independent new events, the combined model yielded an RMSE of 0.0191, a sign balanced accuracy of 0.628, and a three-class balanced accuracy of 0.514, and did not outperform a zero-change baseline in continuous RMSE. Thus, the indices retain value for mechanistic interpretation and within-domain prioritization, but the fitted coefficients and screening performance are not uniformly transferable. The framework is therefore a screening heuristic, not a substitute for direct nonlinear SSI analysis.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Civil and Structural Engineering

Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering