Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery· 2015Q1· Review
Efficacy of Intra‐articular Platelet‐Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
- 446citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections significantly improve pain, physical function, and stiffness in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) for up to 12 months post-injection.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- PRP injections significantly improve pain, physical function, and stiffness in knee OA patients up to 12 months.
- PRP showed significantly better clinical outcomes and WOMAC scores compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) at 3-12 months post-injection.
- Average post-treatment WOMAC scores for PRP were 28.5 (3-6 months) and 22.8 (6-12 months), compared to 43.4 and 38.1 for HA, respectively.
- Limited evidence exists for comparing leukocyte-rich vs. leukocyte-poor PRP or PRP vs. corticosteroid injections.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine (1) whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection significantly improves validated patient-reported outcomes in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) at 6 and 12 months postinjection, (2) differences in outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid injections or viscosupplementation or placebo injections at 6 and 12 months postinjection, and (3) similarities and differences in outcomes based on the PRP formulations used in the analyzed studies. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and Sport Discus were searched for English-language, level I evidence, human in vivo studies on the treatment of symptomatic knee OA with intra-articular PRP compared with other options, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. A quality assessment of all articles was performed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (average, 83.3/100), and outcomes were analyzed using 2-proportion z-tests. RESULTS: Six articles (739 patients, 817 knees, 39% males, mean age of 59.9 years, with 38 weeks average follow-up) were analyzed. All studies met minimal clinical important difference criteria and showed significant improvements in statistical and clinical outcomes, including pain, physical function, and stiffness, with PRP. All but one study showed significant differences in clinical outcomes between PRP and hyaluronic acid (HA) or PRP and placebo in pain and function. Average pretreatment Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were 52.36 and 52.05 for the PRP and HA groups, respectively (P = .420). Mean post-treatment WOMAC scores for PRP were significantly better than for HA at 3 to 6 months (28.5 and 43.4, respectively; P = .0008) and at 6 to 12 months (22.8 and 38.1, respectively; P = .0062). None of the included studies used corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic knee OA, PRP injection results in significant clinical improvements up to 12 months postinjection. Clinical outcomes and WOMAC scores are significantly better after PRP versus HA at 3 to 12 months postinjection. There is limited evidence for comparing leukocyte-rich versus leukocyte-poor PRP or PRP versus steroids in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review of Level I studies.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Urology
UrologyMedicine