PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Public Health· 2026Q1

Environmental noise as a socioeconomic stressor: evidence from a systematic review

Marzieh Belji Kangarlou, Neda Mehrparvar, Behzad Saranjam, Zahed Ahmadi et al.

Short summary

Environmental noise exposure is disproportionately concentrated in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and linked to lower income, greater deprivation, annoyance, psychological distress, sleep disturbance, and reduced quality of life.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 58 studies were included in the systematic review, with 82.8% being cross-sectional.
  • Transportation noise was the most common exposure source (86.2%).
  • Economic outcomes, particularly housing-market effects, were the most frequently investigated (44.8%).
  • Higher noise exposure correlated with lower income, greater deprivation, annoyance, psychological distress, sleep disturbance, and reduced quality of life.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Environmental noise affects multiple dimensions of human well-being, including economic conditions, social equity, and psychosocial functioning. Nevertheless, evidence on its socioeconomic outcomes remains fragmented across different noise sources and study settings. This systematic review synthesized the available evidence on the socioeconomic impacts of environmental noise exposure. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published since 2000 in English or Persian. Eligible studies quantitatively examined associations between environmental noise exposure and socioeconomic outcomes. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by multiple reviewers, and methodological quality was assessed using design-specific critical-appraisal instruments, including the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including cross-sectional ( n = 48, 82.8%), cohort ( n = 3, 5.2%), quasi-experimental ( n = 3, 5.2%), case ( n = 3, 5.2%), and observational studies ( n = 1, 1.7%). Transportation noise was the predominant exposure category ( n = 50, 86.2%), followed by community/residential noise ( n = 6, 10.3%) and multiple-source noise ( n = 2, 3.5%). Economic outcomes were the most frequently investigated outcomes ( n = 26, 44.8%), particularly housing-market effects ( n = 21, 36.2%). Higher noise exposure was disproportionately concentrated in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and was associated with lower income, greater deprivation, annoyance, psychological distress, sleep disturbance, and reduced quality of life. Environmental noise is associated with substantial socioeconomic outcomes, including economic losses, psychosocial burden, and environmental inequalities. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating noise mitigation into urban-planning and public-health strategies aimed at promoting healthier and more equitable living environments.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Public Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Speech and Hearing

Speech and HearingHealth Professions