PofoliaShared via Pofolia

IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development· 2015

Investigating Critical Frequency Bands and Channels for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition with Deep Neural Networks

Wei‐Long Zheng, Bao‐Liang Lu

Short summary

Deep belief networks (DBNs) identified critical EEG frequency bands and channels that achieved 86.65% accuracy in recognizing positive, neutral, and negative emotions, outperforming models using all 62 original channels.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Deep belief networks (DBNs) achieved 86.65% accuracy in recognizing three emotions from EEG data.
  • Critical frequency bands and channels were identified using DBN weights, outperforming models using all 62 original channels.
  • DBNs outperformed shallow models (SVM, LR, KNN) with average accuracies of 86.08% vs. 83.99%, 82.70%, and 72.60%, respectively.
  • Neural signatures for emotions were found to be consistent across sessions and individuals.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

To investigate critical frequency bands and channels, this paper introduces deep belief networks (DBNs) to constructing EEG-based emotion recognition models for three emotions: positive, neutral and negative. We develop an EEG dataset acquired from 15 subjects. Each subject performs the experiments twice at the interval of a few days. DBNs are trained with differential entropy features extracted from multichannel EEG data. We examine the weights of the trained DBNs and investigate the critical frequency bands and channels. Four different profiles of 4, 6, 9, and 12 channels are selected. The recognition accuracies of these four profiles are relatively stable with the best accuracy of 86.65%, which is even better than that of the original 62 channels. The critical frequency bands and channels determined by using the weights of trained DBNs are consistent with the existing observations. In addition, our experiment results show that neural signatures associated with different emotions do exist and they share commonality across sessions and individuals. We compare the performance of deep models with shallow models. The average accuracies of DBN, SVM, LR, and KNN are 86.08%, 83.99%, 82.70%, and 72.60%, respectively.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cognitive Neuroscience

Cognitive NeuroscienceNeuroscience