International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health· 2025Q1· Review
What Pushes University Professors to Burnout? A Systematic Review of Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Determinants
- 24citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2025year
Short summary
Excessive workload, lack of institutional support, and workplace conflict are key risk factors for university professor burnout, while collegial support, participative leadership, and job satisfaction act as protective elements. Data from ~43,639 academic staff across 60 studies (2019-2024) were synthesized.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Excessive workload, lack of institutional support, and workplace conflict are primary risk factors for academic burnout.
- Collegial support, participative leadership, and job satisfaction act as significant protective factors against burnout.
- Sociodemographic factors like age, gender, academic rank, and employment stability influence burnout vulnerability.
- Data synthesized from ~43,639 academic staff across 60 quantitative studies (2019-2024).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Burnout syndrome is a growing concern in higher education, affecting the psychological well-being and performance of university professors. This systematic review presents a narrative synthesis of findings from quantitative studies on sociodemographic and psychosocial determinants of academic burnout. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, sixty peer-reviewed articles published between Jan 2019 and May 2024 were selected from Scopus and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria required validated psychometric instruments and exclusive focus on university faculty. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and CASP checklist. Data from approximately 43,639 academic staff were analyzed. Key risk factors identified include excessive workload, lack of institutional support, and workplace conflict. In contrast, collegial support, participative leadership, and job satisfaction functioned as protective elements. Variables such as age, gender, academic rank, and employment stability significantly influenced burnout vulnerability. While general patterns were observed across studies, differences in design and sampling require caution in generalization. The evidence supports the implementation of integrated strategies encompassing mental health programs, workload regulation, participatory governance, and culturally responsive approaches. These findings inform the development of institutional policies aimed at preventing burnout and fostering academic well-being. Future research should adopt longitudinal and cross-cultural designs to further explore burnout trajectories and support educational reform.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2025 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Health Professions
General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions