Sustainability· 2026Q1
Biogas Plants in the Sustainable Energy Transition: Environmental Performance, Public Health Implications and Socio-Economic Trade-Offs
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Biogas systems offer substantial decarbonization and waste management benefits when methane losses are controlled, energy is used effectively, and digestate is managed safely, according to a full-chain assessment of 182 references.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Biogas systems can support decarbonization, organic waste management, and local energy security.
- Full value chain assessment is crucial, including feedstock, digestion, energy use, emission control, and digestate management.
- Substantial benefits from waste/residue-based systems are achievable with controlled methane losses, effective energy use, and safe digestate management.
- Health impacts require distinguishing potential hazards from actual exposure and confirmed effects.
- Economic viability and social value depend on financial conditions, local value retention, and equitable distribution of benefits and burdens.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Biogas plants can support decarbonisation, organic waste management and local energy security. Their contribution to a sustainable transition, however, cannot be judged by biogas production alone. The aim of this work was to assess biogas systems across the full value chain, from feedstock sourcing and transport through anaerobic digestion (AD) to energy use, emission control and digestate management. A narrative review was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and ScienceDirect. Google Scholar was used for supplementary searches, while additional information was obtained from institutional sources. The final evidence base comprised 182 references. Because the studies differed in plant type, methods, system boundaries and reported outcomes, the literature was synthesised thematically. The novelty of the review lies in integrating environmental performance, public and occupational health, and economic and social conditions within a single full-chain assessment, while examining whether benefits in one area create costs or risks elsewhere. The reviewed evidence indicates that waste- and residue-based systems can provide substantial benefits when methane losses are controlled, energy is used effectively and digestate is managed safely. Health assessment must distinguish potential hazards from actual exposure and confirmed health effects. Economic viability and social value, in turn, depend on financial conditions, local value retention and the distribution of benefits and burdens. A two-step integrated assessment framework is proposed, with minimum environmental, health and safety conditions assessed before broader sustainability performance and trade-offs are considered. Biogas sustainability is therefore best demonstrated by verified whole-system performance rather than by gas production or profitability alone.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Sustainability, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Building and Construction
Building and ConstructionEngineering