Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics· 2026Q1
Effect of delivery method on periapical extrusion of a hydraulic calcium silicate cement-based sealer during single-cone root canal filling technique: An in vitro study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
In a study of 48 molars, syringe injection (SI) of a hydraulic calcium silicate cement-based sealer (HCSCS) resulted in periapical extrusion in 62.5% of cases, compared to 31.25% for cone coating (CC) and sonic agitation (EA), though this difference was not statistically significant.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Syringe injection (SI) led to periapical extrusion in 62.5% of simulated root canals.
- Cone coating (CC) and sonic agitation (EA) groups showed lower extrusion rates of 31.25% each.
- The observed differences in extrusion rates between the three delivery methods were not statistically significant (P = 0.151).
- The study used a closed-system model with polyvinyl siloxane and blueberry to simulate periapical resistance.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background: Hydraulic calcium silicate cement-based sealers (HCSCSs) have become increasingly popular in single-cone obturation techniques due to their superior biocompatibility and flowability. However, the inherent flowability of these materials may predispose them to periapical extrusion. Despite the clinical significance of sealer extrusion, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal delivery method to minimize this complication. Aim: To compare three delivery methods for a ready-to-use HCSCS during single-cone root canal filling in mandibular molars and evaluate their effect on periapical extrusion. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight human mandibular molars with single distal canals were instrumented to a standardized apical size and filled using EndoSequence BC sealer with three delivery methods: syringe injection (SI), cone coating (CC), and injection followed by sonic agitation with an EndoActivator (EA). Each group contained 16 samples (n = 16). A closed-system model was established using polyvinyl siloxane and blueberry as a biological barrier to simulate periapical resistance. Periapical extrusion was assessed radiographically using two projections immediately after root canal filling. Results: The SI group displayed periapical extrusion in 62.5% of samples, compared to 31.25% in both the CC and EA groups. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.151). Conclusion: The delivery method did not significantly influence the frequency of periapical extrusion when using HCSCS with the single-cone technique. Nevertheless, the numerical trend toward reduced extrusion with passive CC and sonic agitation warrants further investigation to optimize sealer placement and reduce the risk of complications associated with periapical extrusion.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oral Surgery
Oral SurgeryDentistry