PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Global Policy· 2026Q1

Geofinance and Fragmentation: Wholesale Central Bank Digital Currencies

Lucia Quaglia, Amy Verdun

Short summary

Wholesale Central Bank Digital Currencies (w-CBDCs) are paradoxically fragmenting the global financial system by fostering 'minilateral' blocs of interoperable jurisdictions, rather than promoting frictionless flows.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Wholesale CBDCs are leading to the fragmentation of the international financial system.
  • This fragmentation occurs through the formation of 'minilateral' blocs of interoperable 'friendly' jurisdictions.
  • Geofinance, driven by major jurisdictions' pursuit of financial sovereignty and currency promotion, is the primary explanatory factor.
  • Initiatives from China (mBridge, Ensemble), Russia (BRICS Bridge), the EU (Pontes, Appia), and the BIS (Agorá) illustrate these geopolitical and monetary rivalries.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), especially wholesale ones, were initially hailed as tools for frictionless global financial flows. Paradoxically, however, they are contributing to the fragmentation of the international financial system through the emergence of minilateral blocs of ‘friendly’ jurisdictions that have established, or sought to establish, interoperability among their wholesale CBDCs, while remaining disconnected from rival arrangements. This outcome is difficult to reconcile with existing explanations. Indeed, international financial institutions mobilised early to promote interoperability, and much of the financial industry has favoured more integrated cross‐border payment infrastructures. This paper argues that geofinance, and specifically efforts by major jurisdictions to preserve sovereignty over critical financial infrastructures and promote their currencies internationally, provides a more convincing explanation. Through an analysis of initiatives led by China (mBridge and Ensemble), Russia (BRICS Bridge), the European Union (Pontes and Appia) and the Bank for International Settlements (Agorá, in which the United States also participates), the paper shows how geopolitical and monetary rivalries are reshaping the architecture of global finance. Empirical evidence is drawn from public documents, media coverage and 28 elite interviews.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Global Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Finance

FinanceEconomics, Econometrics and Finance