Cancers· 2026Q1· Review
A Contemporary Review of Resectability and Treatment Strategies for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Part 1—Diagnosis, Defining Resectability, and Management of Upfront Resectable and Synchronous Disease
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Contemporary management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) integrates patient fitness, technical resectability, and tumor biology, moving beyond solely technical feasibility for defining resectability.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Resectability for CRLM is defined by patient fitness, technical feasibility, and tumor biology, not just technical aspects.
- Routine neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upfront resectable CRLM has not consistently improved survival; short-course preoperative therapy may benefit select high-risk patients.
- Margin strategy for CRLM resection is evolving to be biology-informed rather than based on fixed margin widths.
- For synchronous CRLM, operative sequencing should be individualized based on disease burden, complexity, and the need to maintain systemic therapy access.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) remain a major determinant of long-term outcome. Although hepatic resection offers the best chance of durable survival, the definition of resectability has evolved beyond technical feasibility alone. This review aims to provide a structured overview of contemporary management strategies for patients with upfront technically resectable or synchronous CRLM, with emphasis on patient selection, tumor biology, perioperative systemic therapy, margin strategy, and surgical sequencing. Methods: A structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies published between 2000 and 2026. Eligible studies evaluated surgical, liver-directed, or systemic treatment strategies for CRLMs and reported outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence, margin status, or perioperative morbidity. Given the heterogeneity of the available evidence, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Contemporary management of CRLMs requires integration of patient fitness, technical resectability, and tumor biology. In upfront technically resectable disease, routine neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not consistently improved overall survival, whereas selected high-risk patients may benefit from short-course preoperative therapy. Margin strategy is increasingly biology-informed rather than based on a universal margin width. In synchronous disease, no single operative sequence is superior for all patients; treatment should be selected according to disease burden, operative complexity, and the need to preserve access to systemic therapy. Conclusions: Management of upfront resectable and synchronous CRLMs should be individualized through multidisciplinary assessment. Current evidence supports a risk-adapted strategy that integrates technical feasibility, patient factors, and tumor biology while recognizing persistent uncertainty regarding optimal chemotherapy timing and surgical sequencing.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cancers, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hepatology
HepatologyMedicine