PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The British Journal for the History of Science· 2026Q1

Bodies of knowledge: experience, commodification and labour in the imperial wildlife trade

Charlotte M. Hoes

Short summary

Late 19th/early 20th-century zoological knowledge production was fueled by the wildlife trade, which relied on and shaped 'embodied' skills of animal handlers, as shown by German dealers Reiche and Ruhe.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Zoological knowledge production in the late 19th/early 20th century was tied to the wildlife trade.
  • The trade relied on 'embodied' knowledge, shaped by direct experience with animals.
  • German dealers Reiche and Ruhe leveraged canary trade expertise for wildlife trade expansion.
  • The study highlights the contributions of overlooked workers in animal handling and transport.
  • It demonstrates the co-production of knowledge and economic expertise in imperial settings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The production of zoological knowledge in the late nineteenth century and the early twentieth was closely tied to the supply of animal bodies to institutions like zoological gardens and university departments, sustained by a growing wildlife trade. This trade, however, used, developed and altered independent forms of knowledge that relied heavily on skills and competencies formed through experience and familiarization. These were ‘embodied’ in the sense that they were not only applied to the handling of these animals, but also shaped by the very animal bodies that were to be handled. Using the two German animal dealers Reiche and Ruhe as case studies, this paper examines the formation of this knowledge and the extent to which it was shaped by commercial interests. Originally canary traders, both companies leveraged their expertise and resources to expand into the wildlife trade. The paper thus explores how the canary trade provided transferable logistical knowledge and skills for the wildlife trade, highlighting the contributions of often unacknowledged workers in capturing, looking after and transporting animals. By foregrounding these complex networks and overlooked actors and spaces, this study sheds light on the co-production of knowledge and economic expertise in imperial contexts.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The British Journal for the History of Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geography, Planning and Development

Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSocial Sciences