PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of the Optical Society of America A· 2017Q2

Experimental comparison of single-pixel imaging algorithms

Liheng Bian, Jinli Suo, Qionghai Dai, Feng Chen

Short summary

The CS-based total variation (TV) regularization method requires the fewest measurements and least running time for small-scale single-pixel imaging reconstruction, while CGD and AP methods are fastest for large-scale cases and TV/AP are most robust to noise.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CS-based total variation (TV) regularization requires fewest measurements and least time for small-scale SPI reconstruction.
  • Conjugate gradient descent (CGD) and alternating projection (AP) methods are fastest for large-scale SPI reconstruction.
  • TV and AP methods demonstrate the highest robustness to measurement noise in SPI.
  • Different SPI algorithms present trade-offs between capture efficiency, computational complexity, and noise robustness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Single-pixel imaging (SPI) is a novel technique that captures 2D images using a photodiode, instead of conventional 2D array sensors. SPI has high signal-to-noise ratio, wide spectral range, low cost, and robustness to light scattering. Various algorithms have been proposed for SPI reconstruction, including linear correlation methods, the alternating projection (AP) method, and compressive sensing (CS) based methods. However, there has been no comprehensive review discussing respective advantages, which is important for SPI's further applications and development. In this paper, we review and compare these algorithms in a unified reconstruction framework. We also propose two other SPI algorithms, including a conjugate gradient descent (CGD) based method and a Poisson maximum-likelihood-based method. Both simulations and experiments validate the following conclusions: to obtain comparable reconstruction accuracy, the CS-based total variation (TV) regularization method requires the fewest measurements and consumes the least running time for small-scale reconstruction, the CGD and AP methods run fastest in large-scale cases, and the TV and AP methods are the most robust to measurement noise. In a word, there are trade-offs in capture efficiency, computational complexity, and robustness to noise among different SPI algorithms. We have released our source code for non-commercial use.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Acoustics and UltrasonicsPhysics and Astronomy