PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Accounting Organizations and Society· 2026Q1

Do bonus deferral and bonus recovery affect employee effort?

Mandy Cheng, Tami Dinh, Maria Lotze, Alexander Schäffer et al.

Short summary

Bonus deferral increases employee effort towards output quantity, while bonus recovery improves output quality but reduces quantity. Combining both leads to lower overall performance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Bonus deferral increases employee effort towards output quantity.
  • Bonus recovery enhances performance quality but reduces output quantity.
  • Combining bonus deferral and bonus recovery decreases overall employee performance.
  • Bonus deferral promotes an abstract mindset focused on firm benefit; bonus recovery activates a monetary mindset.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

We examine how bonus deferral and bonus recovery affect performance in an effort-sensitive task, where improving overall performance requires effort towards output quantity and output quality. Deferred bonuses and bonus recovery are important elements in contemporary incentive schemes designed to motivate employees to act in the best interest of the firm. We propose that bonus deferral improves performance by encouraging employees to adopt an abstract mindset that focuses on behavior for the good of the firm (“to do the right thing”) and thus to exert more effort. In contrast, bonus recovery serves an effort-directing role by indicating undesirable behavior that should be avoided. Bonus recovery activates a mindset that focuses on the monetary implications of their behavior and thus supersedes the abstract mindset of bonus deferral and its positive effects. Our experimental results show that bonus deferral leads to higher performance quantity; in contrast, bonus recovery increases performance quality, the performance domain related to bonus recovery, but at the expense of performance quantity. Furthermore, we find that bonus recovery counteracts the positive effects of bonus deferral and leads to a reduction in overall performance. Two supplemental experiments provide direct process evidence supporting the proposed theoretical mechanism. Our study contributes to the debate on effective compensation by showing that combining bonus deferral and bonus recovery may have undesirable consequences on effort provision and allocation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Accounting Organizations and Society, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Safety Research

Safety ResearchSocial Sciences