PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Medical Ethics· 2026Q1

Ethical and design considerations related to automated, confidential HIV testing invitations: insights from senders and recipients of SMS-based HIV testing invitations in Tanzania

Salome-Joelle Gass, Valerie Yelverton, Bernard Njau, Thespina Yamanis et al.

Short summary

A pilot SMS-based HIV testing invitation system (CONSORT) in Tanzania revealed that participants' trust and engagement were shaped by varied interpretations of message origin and purpose, with some expressing privacy concerns regarding phone number sharing without consent.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Interpretations of SMS invitation origin and purpose significantly influenced participant trust and engagement in an HIV testing pilot.
  • Some participants expressed privacy concerns regarding the sharing of phone numbers without explicit prior consent.
  • Perceptions of confidentiality, message timing, and content were key factors affecting intervention acceptability.
  • Ethical considerations were central to user experiences and led to design modifications of the CONSORT system.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Identifying individuals with undiagnosed HIV remains a global challenge. Mobile health (mHealth) approaches that leverage social networks hold potential to increase HIV testing uptake but also raise ethical considerations. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in Moshi, Tanzania, to examine how a pilot test of an SMS-based confidential referral system for HIV testing (CONSORT) was experienced by individuals sending and receiving testing invitations. Focus group discussions were conducted prior to the pilot, while phone-based interviews were conducted both before and after pilot implementation. Data were analyzed thematically using the four ethical principles of mHealth delivery: transparency, agency, accountability, and equitable access. Results Interpretations of message origin and purpose varied, shaping levels of trust and engagement. While many participants viewed the messages as supportive reminders, a few expressed confusion or concern about why they were selected. Attitudes also varied regarding the sharing of phone numbers without prior consent, with some participants viewing this as acceptable and others raising privacy concerns. Perceptions of confidentiality, message timing, and message content influenced acceptability of the intervention. These perspectives informed modifications to the design of the CONSORT system. Conclusions Ethical considerations were integral to participant experiences of CONSORT, demonstrating the need for participatory, context-specific design of mHealth interventions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Medical Ethics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Health Professions

General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions