CATENA· 2026Q1
Improving global rainfall erosivity estimates from IMERG using machine learning–based error correction
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A machine learning model significantly improves global rainfall erosivity estimates from satellite data (IMERG) by correcting systematic underestimations, reducing bias to <1% and increasing correlation with ground observations from R=0.70-0.73 to R=0.93-0.94.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Machine learning corrects systematic underestimations in IMERG rainfall erosivity data.
- Corrected estimates show <1% relative bias and improved correlation (R=0.93-0.94) compared to ground-based values.
- Errors are linked to atmospheric moisture, energy fluxes, and extreme precipitation events.
- An open-source framework is provided for reproducible, point-scale erosivity estimation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Rainfall erosivity is a key driver of soil erosion and hydrologic processes, yet its estimation remains limited by sparse gauge observations and uncertainties in satellite precipitation products. This study presents a machine learning–based framework to improve global rainfall erosivity estimates derived from the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. Rather than directly estimating erosivity from satellite precipitation, we focus on modeling and correcting the errors between IMERG-derived and gauge-based erosivity using a suite of hydroclimatic and land surface predictors. Global evaluation using 5935 gauge stations shows that erosivity derived from IMERG V06 and V07 systematically underestimates ground-based values by 56% and 62%, respectively, although both products capture spatial variability with moderate-to-high correlation ( R = 0.70–0.73). The proposed machine learning correction substantially reduces bias and error magnitude, yielding near-unbiased estimates (relative bias <1%) and improved agreement with observations ( R = 0.93–0.94). Feature attribution analysis indicates that errors are primarily associated with atmospheric moisture, energy fluxes, and precipitation extremes, highlighting the physical controls on satellite retrieval limitations. We further show that differences in residual structure between IMERG versions influence model learnability, and that spatial scale plays a critical role in shaping erosivity estimates, with grid-based products smoothing extreme rainfall signals. The resulting open-source framework enables reproducible, point-scale estimation of rainfall erosivity from globally available data and provides an accessible workflow for applying machine-learning-based error correction to satellite-derived erosivity estimates. This open and reproducible implementation supports broader applications in soil erosion modeling, land management, and hydrologic assessments, particularly in regions with limited ground observations.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. CATENA, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Soil Science
Soil ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences