Applied Sciences· 2026Q2
Testing AI-Based Systems: A Systematic Mapping of Challenges and Approaches
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic mapping of 26 studies reveals that testing AI-based systems faces five key challenges (e.g., weak specifications, data dependence) and is addressed by five corresponding approach categories (e.g., metric-based testing, continuous validation), with classical testing concepts being reinterpreted rather than replaced.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Five recurring challenge categories in AI system testing include weak specifications, data dependence, non-functional properties, dynamic environments, and continuous evolution.
- Five corresponding approach categories identified are metric-based/comparative testing, scenario-based testing/simulation, architecture-driven testing, continuous/post-deployment validation, and standards-aligned/process-oriented testing.
- Classical testing concepts are reinterpreted and extended, not replaced, for AI-based systems.
- Evidence for specific challenge-approach combinations is uneven, with some combinations (e.g., architecture-driven testing for specific challenges) having limited representation, and seven combinations remaining empty.
- The mapping is grounded in ISO/IEC 29119 and ISO/IEC TR 29119-11 standards.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) components are increasingly embedded in software, challenging established assumptions of software testing practice. This article presents a systematic mapping review of testing approaches for AI-based systems, grounded in ISO/IEC 29119 and ISO/IEC TR 29119-11. The contribution is a structured, traceable mapping from challenges to approaches at the level of AI-based systems. From 1212 identified records, 26 studies were included in the final mapping, complemented by seven ISO/IEC and ISO/IEC/IEEE normative documents that were analysed for normative guidance rather than as empirical evidence. The review identifies five recurring challenge categories—weak specifications and the test oracle problem, data dependence and test inputs, non-functional and socio-technical properties, complex and dynamic environments, and continuous evolution and adaptation. It synthesises five corresponding approach categories: metric-based and comparative testing, scenario-based testing and simulation, architecture-driven testing, continuous validation and post-deployment testing, and standards-aligned and process-oriented testing. Across the mapped studies, classical testing concepts are reinterpreted and extended rather than replaced. However, evidence is unevenly distributed across challenge–approach combinations: architecture-driven testing is represented by two primary studies, while socio-technical properties are addressed only by two secondary studies in the standards-aligned and process-oriented category. Seven of the twenty-five challenge–approach combinations remain empty.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Software
SoftwareComputer Science