Structures· 2026Q1
Reliability analysis of the world's longest-span CFST arch bridge using an interval-focused active-learning surrogate model
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A novel interval-focused active-learning multilayer perceptron surrogate (IF-AL-MLP) model improves prediction accuracy in critical and safe response intervals for the Third Pingnan Bridge (560 m), reducing critical-interval MSE by 60.2% and safe-interval MSE by 56.7% compared to a conventional MLP.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- An IF-AL-MLP model was developed for global-stability reliability analysis of long-span CFST arch bridges.
- The model achieved a 60.2% reduction in critical-interval MSE and a 56.7% reduction in safe-interval MSE compared to a conventional MLP.
- IF-AL-MLP yielded lower MSEs than AK-MCS across all three predefined intervals (failure, critical, safe).
- All tested models produced reliability indices exceeding the code requirement of 4.7, with statistically similar failure-probability estimates.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Reliability analysis of long-span concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) arch bridges remains challenging because structural stability is governed by multiple uncertain parameters, and conventional surrogate models may not provide balanced prediction accuracy across failure, critical, and safe response intervals. An interval-focused active-learning multilayer perceptron surrogate (IF-AL-MLP) is therefore developed for the global-stability reliability analysis of the Third Pingnan Bridge (560 m). A refined finite element model (FEM) is established to compute the stability index K . Under a common budget of 4000 FEM-evaluated training samples, the proposed model is compared with a conventional MLP and standard active Kriging-Monte Carlo simulation (AK-MCS) using the same 400 FEM test samples. The final surrogates are then applied to three independent sets of 20 million Monte Carlo samples. Although the failure-interval mean squared error (MSE) of the IF-AL-MLP is slightly higher than that of the conventional MLP, it reduces the critical- and safe-interval MSEs by 60.2% and 56.7%, respectively, and yields lower MSEs than AK-MCS in all three predefined intervals. All three models produce reliability indices exceeding the code requirement of 4.7. Their exact Poisson confidence intervals overlap substantially, indicating that the differences among the failure-probability estimates are not statistically significant, while the IF-AL-MLP yields identical failure counts across the three simulations. These results show that the proposed strategy provides balanced interval-wise regression accuracy and supports the same code-based reliability conclusion as the benchmark methods, without establishing a universal ranking of surrogate methods.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Structures, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyDecision Sciences