Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications· 2026Q2
Comparative Analyses of the Type D ASEP: Stochastic Fusion and Crystal Bases
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
The Type D asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP) yields different generator matrices when analyzed using stochastic fusion (probabilistic) versus crystal bases derived from Lie algebra representations (algebraic), indicating these methods describe distinct processes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Stochastic fusion of Type D ASEP was analyzed probabilistically, examining generator matrices, drift speed, and stationary distributions.
- A fused Type D ASEP system was constructed algebraically using crystal bases from $\mathcal{U}_q(\mathfrak{so}_6)$ representations.
- The generator matrices obtained from probabilistic (stochastic fusion) and algebraic (crystal bases) methods were found to be different.
- The relationship between stochastic fusion and ground state transformations, established for normal ASEP, does not extend to all simple Lie algebras, specifically Type D ASEP.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The Type D asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP), a particle system involving two classes of particles, was studied from both probabilistic and algebraic perspectives by Kuan et al. (2022). From a probabilistic perspective, we perform stochastic fusion on the Type D ASEP introduced by Kuan (2019) and analyze the outcome on the generator matrix, limits of drift speed, stationary distributions, and Markov self-duality. From an algebraic perspective, we construct a fused Type D ASEP system from a Casimir element of $\mathcal{U}_q(\mathfrak{so}_6)$, using crystal bases to analyze and manipulate various representations of $\mathcal{U}_q(\mathfrak{so}_6)$. We know that the same generators for the normal ASEP are produced by stochastic fusion and by a suitable ground state transformation on a central element of $\mathcal{U}_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ in a symmetric tensor product representation. However, in the case of the Type D ASEP, we find that the probabilistic and algebraic generator matrices are not the same and thus represent different processes. We conclude that the relationship between stochastic fusion and a ground state transformation (specifically, what we term the Type A ground state transformation) established by Kuan (2019) does not generalize to all finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Surfaces, Coatings and FilmsMaterials Science