Pain Practice· 2026Q1
Pain Management in Older Adults: An Interprofessional Training Approach Assessed by Script Concordance Tests
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A 60-minute interprofessional training session improved anesthesiologists' clinical reasoning in perioperative pain management for older adults, increasing their concordance with expert opinion by 29.7% on a script concordance test.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A 60-minute interprofessional training session improved anesthesiologists' clinical reasoning in perioperative pain management for older adults.
- Mean script concordance test scores increased by 29.7% post-training (p < 0.001), indicating greater agreement with expert opinion.
- Improvements were observed in analgesic prescription (+47.9%) and adverse effect management (+26.8%), but not significantly in pain assessment.
- Most participants (89.5%) had no prior training in prescribing analgesics to older adults.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Optimal perioperative pain management in older adults challenges anesthesiologists due to increased drug sensitivity, altered pharmacokinetics, and limitations of pain assessment tools in cognitively impaired patients. This study evaluated whether a single 60‐min structured collaborative training session between a geriatrician and a clinical pharmacist is associated with improved anesthesiologists' clinical reasoning regarding perioperative analgesic management in older adults, as measured by increased concordance with expert opinion on a script concordance test (SCT). Methods SCT assessed 20 clinical vignettes covering pain assessment, analgesic selection, and adverse effect management domains. These were submitted to anesthesiologists before and after training. A panel of 13 geriatricians established scoring criteria. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Paired t ‐tests and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests compared pre‐ and post‐training scores, with the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the overall change estimated by bootstrap resampling. Results Seventeen anesthesiologists completed both assessments. Mean SCT scores increased from 45.8 ± 7.4 to 59.5 ± 8.5 post‐training ( p < 0.001), showing a 29.7% improvement (95% CI, 18.7%–41.7%). Analysis revealed improvements in analgesic prescription (+47.9%; 95% CI, 10.0–28.1 points) and adverse effect management (+26.8%; 95% CI, 9.1–19.0 points), while the change in pain assessment was not statistically significant (−11.6%; 95% CI, −16.6–9.4 points). Internal consistency improved from 0.542 to 0.704. Most participants (89.5%) lacked prior training in prescribing analgesics to older adults, and 73.7% were unfamiliar with clinical guidelines. Conclusion This study suggests that collaborative geriatrician‐pharmacist training is associated with improved anesthesiologists' clinical reasoning regarding perioperative analgesic management in older adults, as measured by greater concordance with expert opinion on a script concordance test. The varying effects across domains suggest that distinct competencies may require distinct educational approaches. These findings support further investigation of interprofessional education into anesthesiology training to enhance clinical reasoning in the care of older surgical patients.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Pain Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineMedicine