Heliyon· 2024Q1
The memory systems of the human brain and generative artificial intelligence
- 22citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2024year
Short summary
Human memory recall, involving whole memory generation from incomplete cues and prospective thought, is computationally distinct from generative AI, which uses next-token prediction and non-local backpropagation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Human memory generation involves recalling whole memories and prospective thoughts from incomplete cues, unlike AI's next-token prediction.
- The human hippocampus uses local associative learning rules, contrasting with AI's non-local backpropagation of error.
- Primate hippocampal systems incorporate spatial view and object-in-scene computations, a feature not mirrored in current generative AI.
- The computational mechanisms of human intelligence are argued to be very different from those implemented in generative AI.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence foundation models (for example Generative Pre-trained Transformer - GPT - models) can generate the next token given a sequence of tokens. How can this 'generative AI' be compared with the 'real' intelligence of the human brain, when for example a human generates a whole memory in response to an incomplete retrieval cue, and then generates further prospective thoughts? Here these two types of generative intelligence, artificial in machines and real in the human brain are compared, and it is shown how when whole memories are generated by hippocampal recall in response to an incomplete retrieval cue, what the human brain computes, and how it computes it, are very different from generative AI. Key differences are the use of local associative learning rules in the hippocampal memory system, and of non-local backpropagation of error learning in AI. Indeed, it is argued that the whole operation of the human brain is performed computationally very differently to what is implemented in generative AI. Moreover, it is emphasized that the primate including human hippocampal system includes computations about spatial view and where objects and people are in scenes, whereas in rodents the emphasis is on place cells and path integration by movements between places. This comparison with generative memory and processing in the human brain has interesting implications for the further development of generative AI and for neuroscience research.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Heliyon, 2024 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive NeuroscienceNeuroscience