Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment· 2026Q1· Review
Nutrient cycling, environmental outcomes and mitigation pathways in sugarcane agroecosystems: A comparative synthesis of Brazil and Australia
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Integrating Brazil's large-scale nutrient recycling (vinasse, filter cake) with Australia's precision management (soil-test-based, subsurface placement) offers a pathway to enhance sugarcane agroecosystem sustainability, improve nitrogen use efficiency, and reduce environmental footprints.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Brazil's large-scale sugarcane systems use residue retention and vinasse/filter cake recycling to enhance soil carbon and internal nutrient cycling.
- Australia's smaller, regulated systems employ soil-test-based management and subsurface placement to minimize nutrient transport to the Great Barrier Reef.
- Australian sugarcane has among the lowest fertilizer-N rates globally, yet nitrogen use efficiency remains lower than in Brazil.
- Soil compaction is a shared challenge, addressed by controlled traffic farming (Australia) and strategic subsoil tillage (Brazil).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Sugarcane is a major tropical crop with strong potential to support climate-smart agriculture through efficient nutrient cycling, improved nitrogen use efficiency, biofuel production and enhanced soil carbon dynamics. However, environmental outcomes vary substantially across production systems. This review compares two leading high-efficiency sugarcane systems, Brazil and Australia, examining nutrient cycling, greenhouse gas emissions, nutrient losses and soil organic carbon storage. In Brazil, large-scale rainfed operations (commonly exceeding 10,000 ha) promote high organic inputs through residue retention and recycling of vinasse and filter cake, enhancing soil carbon stocks and internal nutrient recycling; however, these practices can elevate nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas emissions when poorly synchronised with crop demand. In Australia, smaller family-owned systems (~95 ha) operate under environmental regulations and the Six Easy Steps framework, where soil-test–based management, subsurface fertiliser placement and enhanced-efficiency fertilisers target nutrient transport to Great Barrier Reef catchments. Fertiliser-N use in Australian sugarcane has progressively declined to among the lowest rates globally for the crop; however, nitrogen use efficiency remains relatively low compared with Brazil, and off-site nutrient losses have not been fully resolved at scale. Soil compaction is a critical constraint in both countries, addressed by complementary strategies: satellite-guided controlled traffic farming in Australia and strategic subsoil tillage with GPS-guided traffic in Brazil. Across both systems, residue retention, legume rotations and reduced tillage improve nutrient cycling and soil carbon accumulation. Integrating Brazil's nutrient-recycling scale with Australia's precision management offers a convergent pathway to enhance nitrogen use efficiency, reduce environmental footprints and improve sugarcane agroecosystem sustainability.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Soil Science
Soil ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences