PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Antiquaries Journal· 2026Q1· Review

RE-ASSESSING THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANGLO-SAXON PERIOD – AND RE-SETTING THE TONE OF DEBATE

John Hines

Short summary

Nicholas J Higham's "How England Began" argues for the persistence of British Christian identity and a larger migration role in the transition to Anglo-Saxon England, but raises questions about demographic assumptions and the critique of 'Germanist' historiography.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Nicholas J Higham's "How England Began" re-evaluates the transition from Roman Britain to the Anglo-Saxon period.
  • Higham argues for the continued strength of British Christian identity and a larger migration role.
  • The review questions Higham's demographic assumptions and his critique of 'Germanist' historiography.
  • There is a call for more explicit demographic modeling using empirical, regionally focused evidence for 5th- and 6th-century Britain.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This review article examines How England Began: from Roman Britain to the Anglo-Saxons by Nicholas J Higham (225 mm. Pp viii+360, 32 pls. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 2026. isbn 978-0-300-25492-1. £25.00 (hbk)), and its contribution to debates about the transition from Roman Britain to early Anglo-Saxon England. Through a close reading of Gildas’ De excidio Britanniae , Higham argues for the continued strength of British Christian identity while acknowledging a greater role for migration than earlier revisionist models allowed. While this more nuanced treatment of the evidence is to be welcomed, there remain questions about some of his demographic assumptions and the continued use of a supposed ‘Germanist’ historiographical tradition as a polemical target. Archaeological, linguistic and genetic evidence suggests there is a need for more explicit demographic modelling that prioritises empirical, regionally focused and critically balanced interpretations of fifth- and sixth-century Britain.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Antiquaries Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Classics

ClassicsArts and Humanities