PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy· 2026Q2

Neural mobilization in cervicogenic headache: a scoping review of current evidence

Nikita vaid, Kanika , Akanksha Saxena, Mandeep Kumar Jangra

Short summary

Neural mobilization, when used as part of multimodal physiotherapy, appears to improve pain, disability, and quality of life in adults with cervicogenic headache (CGH).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Five studies involving 142 adults with cervicogenic headache were included in the review.
  • Neural mobilization, as part of multimodal physiotherapy, improved pain, headache frequency, and disability.
  • Improvements were also noted in cervical posture, range of motion, and quality of life.
  • Neural mobilization was often combined with postural correction and other physiotherapy interventions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neural mobilization has increasingly been incorporated into physiotherapy management for cervicogenic headache (CGH); however, evidence regarding its clinical effectiveness remains limited. This scoping review aimed to explore and map the existing evidence on neural mobilization in the management of CGH, with emphasis on pain, headache-related disability, and functional outcomes. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), PEDro, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies involving adults with CGH receiving neural mobilization or neurodynamic interventions. Outcomes assessed included pain, headache frequency, disability, cervical posture, and quality of life. RESULTS: From 699 identified records, five studies comprising one pilot randomized controlled trial, two comparative clinical studies, and two case reports involving 142 participants were included in the review. Across the included studies, interventions incorporating neural mobilization were associated with improvements in pain intensity, headache frequency, headache-related disability, cervical posture, cervical range of motion, and quality of life. Neural mobilization was predominantly delivered as part of multimodal physiotherapy programs, particularly alongside postural correction and other physiotherapy interventions. However, the evidence was limited by the small number of studies, methodological heterogeneity, variation in neural mobilization protocols, and limited long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that neural mobilization is a promising adjunct within multimodal physiotherapy management of CGH. However, the available evidence is insufficient to establish its independent therapeutic effectiveness. Further well-designed studies using standardized neural mobilization protocols, appropriate comparator groups, and longer follow-up are required to strengthen the evidence base.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Psychiatry and Mental health

Psychiatry and Mental healthMedicine