Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews· 2026Q1· Review
Sensory Processing and Executive Functioning Interaction in Neurodevelopmental Disorders and At-Risk Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A meta-analysis of 30 studies (N=~2000) reveals a significant medium effect size (d=.58) linking sensory processing (SP) and executive functioning (EF) in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) or at-risk conditions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A meta-analysis of 30 studies found a significant medium effect size (d=.58) for the correlation between sensory processing and executive functioning in children with NDDs or at-risk conditions.
- Sensory processing measures statistically accounted for 28-71% of the variance in executive functioning.
- Performance-based assessment modalities showed higher associative strength and lower heterogeneity compared to questionnaire-based measures.
- Atypical sensory profiles were associated with moderate-to-large differences in executive functioning performance (η² =.10-.34) compared to typical profiles.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the relationship between sensory processing (SP) and executive functioning (EF) in children and adolescents (ages 0-18) diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) or at-risk conditions, such as prematurity and genetic syndromes. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the results of 30 peer-reviewed studies were analyzed by qualitative and quantitative analyses to evaluate the strength and nature of these associations. The findings revealed a consistent and significant correlation between SP and EF, with effect sizes (r) ranging from r =.19 to r =.77. Meta-analytic synthesis confirmed a medium effect size (d =.58). While substantial heterogeneity was observed (I^2 = 82.9%), it was not moderated by the specific diagnosis of NDDs, age, EF component or correlation adjustment status. Notably, assessment modality served as a significant moderator: performance-based measures demonstrated higher associative strength and lower heterogeneity compared to questionnaire-based or combined assessment. Regression models indicated that SP measures statistically accounted for a substantial portion of EF variance (28-71%), while comparative analyses showed moderate-to-large differences in EF performance (η² =.10-.34) between typical and atypical sensory profiles. Furthermore, mediation analyses suggested significant indirect associations involving EF, particularly emotion regulation and inhibitory control, in the relationship between sensory processing and adaptive and functional outcomes. The evidence underscores a robust interdependence between sensory processing and executive functions in clinical and at-risk pediatric populations. These findings highlight the potential relevance of considering both sensory and executive domains in assessment and intervention planning.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPsychology