Child Abuse & Neglect· 2026Q1
When does discipline become assault? Community attitudes towards the legal defence of domestic discipline
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Community members in Queensland, Australia, are more likely to find parents guilty of assaulting a child as the severity of physical force increases, with a 56.9% probability of a guilty finding when the child's face was slapped, compared to 7.2% when the child's hand was merely grabbed tightly.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The probability of a guilty finding for parental assault increases significantly with the severity of physical force, from 7.2% (tight hand grab) to 36.9% (slapped thigh with wooden spoon) to 56.9% (slapped face).
- Situational factors like the severity of force, use of an implement, and child's ADHD diagnosis influenced community members' judgments.
- Many participants, even those favoring a guilty verdict, preferred non-punitive interventions such as parenting support and education over criminal justice responses.
- Qualitative data highlighted widespread community uncertainty regarding the boundary between discipline and abuse.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many jurisdictions internationally continue to permit parents to use physical force against children under defences variously termed 'reasonable force', 'lawful correction', or 'domestic discipline'. In Queensland, Australia, this is codified under section 280 of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld). The appropriateness of such defences is increasingly contested, with child and youth advocates arguing that they effectively decriminalise child abuse, yet little is known about whether community attitudes align with their continued availability. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand how situational factors and community member characteristics shape attitudes towards the legal defence of domestic discipline and what community members believe constitutes a fair outcome, when a parent is charged with assaulting a child. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A quota-sampled survey of 1662 adults and qualitative focus groups with 58 community members, all residing in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: Participants were presented with a vignette describing a parent's use of physical force against an 11-year-old child, with the severity of force, use of an implement, and the child's diagnosis with ADHD experimentally varied. Survey data were analysed using binary logistic regression; focus group data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: After controlling for participant sociodemographics (e.g., age and gender), the predicted probability of a guilty finding rose sharply with the severity of force used, increasing from 7.2% (grabbed hand tightly) to 36.9% (slapped thigh with wooden spoon), and 56.9% (slapped face). Many participants, including several who supported a guilty finding, did not endorse criminal justice intervention, instead favouring parenting support and education. Qualitative findings revealed widespread uncertainty about the threshold between discipline and abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal a gap between current legal tests and community reasoning, and support reform towards non-punitive, education-focused responses to low-level parental discipline, with implications for jurisdictions internationally that retain similar defences.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Health
HealthSocial Sciences