Journalism Studies· 2026Q1
Perceiving the News as Toxic: A Longitudinal, Cross-National Analysis of Negative News Evaluations in Flanders and Ireland
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
News repertoires are shifting towards 'limited' use, particularly among younger and less advantaged groups, associated with negative news attitudes like distrust and fake news concerns.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- News repertoires have shifted from 'panoramic' to 'limited' use between 2017-2025 in Flanders and Ireland.
- Younger and less socioeconomically advantaged groups are driving the shift towards limited news repertoires.
- Limited news repertoires are associated with negative attitudes including distrust, avoidance, disinterest, and fake news concerns.
- Flanders exhibits sharper transitions in news repertoires compared to Ireland, which shows higher initial engagement but emerging disengagement.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
In today’s media environment, where information overload, negativity, and news fatigue are increasingly common, news can feel toxic. Yet little research examines how users perceive this toxicity and adjust their news practices in response. This study addresses that gap through a repeated cross-sectional analysis of Flanders and Ireland. Drawing on DNR-data from 2017-2025 and latent class analysis, we identify three archetypal news repertoires: Panoramic, Limited, and Traditional. Our findings reveal a shift toward limited repertoires, particularly among younger and less socioeconomically advantaged groups, while panoramic repertoires have become rarer, and traditional repertoires have remained stable. These shifts are associated with negative news attitudes, including distrust, avoidance, disinterest, fake news concerns and perceived fake news exposure. The cross-national comparison highlights sharper transitions in Flanders, whereas Irish users retained higher engagement, though early disengagement emerged. By linking negative attitudes or evaluations with changes in repertoires, we contribute to audience research and underscore the need to reconsider the journalism-audience relationship as disengagement is no longer marginal but increasingly mainstream. From a user perspective, repertoire narrowing may be understood as a coping response, although it risks deepening informational inequalities.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journalism Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Communication
CommunicationSocial Sciences