PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia· 2026Q1

Use of smart glasses for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in adults: a randomized clinical trial

Yuwen Wang, Lingling Jiang, Furui Wang, Ping Liu et al.

Short summary

Smart glasses reduced overall central venous catheterization (CVC) procedural time by a median of 26 seconds (158s vs 134s) compared to standard ultrasound screens in a randomized trial of 124 adults.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Smart glasses reduced overall CVC procedural time by 26 seconds (median) compared to standard ultrasound screens (158s vs 134s; P < 0.001).
  • Ultrasound scanning time, venous access time, needle redirections, and probe repositionings were all significantly reduced with smart glasses.
  • Procedural success and complication rates were similar between the smart glasses and control groups.
  • 124 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring CVC were included in the study.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head-mounted displays can be integrated with ultrasonography to overlay the image in the operator's field of view, improving hand-eye coordination during invasive procedures. The clinical efficacy of smart glasses for central venous catheterization (CVC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether using smart glasses can improve efficiency compared to conventional ultrasound-guided CVC. METHODS: This prospective, single-blinded, controlled study enrolled adult patients who underwent elective surgery requiring CVC. Patients were assigned to either the ultrasound screen (control) or smart glasses group using stratified randomization according to operator qualification. The primary outcome was the overall CVC procedural time. Secondary outcomes included ultrasound scanning and venous access time, number of needle redirections and probe repositionings, procedural success and complication rates. RESULTS: In total, 124 patients were analyzed. The overall procedural time was significantly reduced in the smart glasses group compared to that in the control group (158 [140, 189] s vs. 134 [117,150] s; median difference, 26.0 s; 95% CI, [16.0-37.0] s, P < 0.001). Specifically, the ultrasound scanning time (median difference, 3.0 s, P = 0.004), venous access time (median difference, 2.0 s, P = 0.013), number of needle redirections (median difference, 1.0, P = 0.003) and probe repositionings (median difference, 0.0, P = 0.005) were significantly reduced in the smart glasses group compared to those in the control group. However, the success and complication rates were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Smart glasses modestly improved procedural efficiency in ultrasound-guided CVC, potientially for novices, without improving success or complication rates. Larger-sample studies with more diverse operators and patients are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number: NCT06469034 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06469034?id=NCT06469034&rank=1.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Emergency Medical Services

Emergency Medical ServicesHealth Professions