PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Astrophysical Journal· 2012Q1

ON THE LOCAL DARK MATTER DENSITY

Jo Bovy, Scott Tremaine

Short summary

A re-analysis of stellar kinematics data corrects a previous claim of a low dark matter density, finding a value of 0.008 +/- 0.003 Msun/pc^3 (0.3 +/- 0.1 GeV/cm3), consistent with standard estimates.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Previous claim of low local dark matter density (0.0003 Msun/pc^3) is shown to be incorrect.
  • The error arose from assuming mean azimuthal velocity is independent of Galactocentric radius.
  • A flat circular velocity curve in the mid-plane is a more plausible assumption, supported by data.
  • The revised local dark matter density is 0.008 +/- 0.003 Msun/pc^3 (0.3 +/- 0.1 GeV/cm3).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

An analysis of the kinematics of 412 stars at 1-4 kpc from the Galactic mid-plane by Moni Bidin et al. (2012) has claimed to derive a local density of dark matter that is an order of magnitude below standard expectations. We show that this result is incorrect and that it arises from the assumption that the mean azimuthal velocity of the stellar tracers is independent of Galactocentric radius at all heights. We substitute the assumption, supported by data, that the circular speed is independent of radius in the mid-plane. We demonstrate that the assumption of constant mean azimuthal velocity is implausible by showing that it requires the circular velocity to drop more steeply than allowed by any plausible mass model, with or without dark matter, at large heights above the mid-plane. Using the approximation that the circular velocity curve is flat in the mid-plane, we find that the data imply a local dark-matter density of 0.008 +/- 0.003 Msun/pc^3 = 0.3 +/- 0.1 GeV/cm3, fully consistent with standard estimates of this quantity. This is the most robust direct measurement of the local dark-matter density to date.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Astrophysical Journal, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Instrumentation

InstrumentationPhysics and Astronomy