PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal Of Big Data· 2026Q1

TED-FinRisk: a hybrid topic-enhanced framework for typologizing illegal fundraising risk from multi-source case texts

Wenchuan Kuang, Yusiyuan Chen, Chun Yang, Zhe Lin et al.

Short summary

A new hybrid framework, TED-FinRisk, combines data-driven topic discovery (TF-IDF, t-SNE, LDA) with expert calibration (AHP) to create an interpretable risk taxonomy for illegal fundraising from over 1,000 case texts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • TED-FinRisk framework combines TF-IDF, t-SNE, LDA, and AHP for illegal fundraising risk classification.
  • The study analyzed over 1,000 illegal fundraising cases and 6,000 risk records across diverse scenarios.
  • A final taxonomy with six primary categories and secondary labels was developed.
  • FinBERT was used for a reclassification consistency check against expert labels.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Illegal fundraising is increasingly conducted through dispersed digital channels, cross-regional operations, and rapidly changing promotional narratives, which makes static rule lists and purely expert-driven typologies difficult to maintain. This paper presents TED-FinRisk, a hybrid framework for constructing an interpretable risk taxonomy from multi-source case texts. The framework combines term frequency–inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) feature construction, topic exploration assisted by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA)-based topic extraction, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based expert priority calibration under the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) threat–vulnerability–consequence perspective. After the taxonomy is finalized, FinBERT is used for a reclassification consistency check aligned with the final expert labels, examining whether the taxonomy corresponds to recognizable text-semantic patterns within the study corpus. The study is based on a corpus of more than 1,000 illegal fundraising cases and nearly 6,000 associated risk-related records covering scenarios such as elder care, virtual currencies, supply-chain finance, agricultural ventures, film investment, social e-commerce, and overseas investment. The resulting taxonomy contains six primary categories and a set of secondary labels linked to operational indicators for downstream monitoring. These results suggest that combining data-driven topic discovery with expert calibration can produce a risk taxonomy with regulatory semantics and monitoring relevance. The paper contributes a methodology-oriented case study, a reusable taxonomy design process, and a structured basis for future benchmarking and early-warning applications.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal Of Big Data, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Social Sciences

General Social SciencesSocial Sciences