PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Education· 2026Q1

Educational outcomes associated with a project-driven offline–chairside–digital teaching model in undergraduate pediatric dentistry: a controlled quasi-experimental study

Xiao Sun, Yuxuan Li, Mengting Li, 安英 et al.

Short summary

An integrated project-driven teaching model combining offline instruction, chairside clinical exposure, and digital workflows improved undergraduate pediatric dentistry students' overall course grades (88 vs. 85) and clinical performance compared to traditional methods.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The integrated teaching model resulted in higher average course scores (88 vs. 85) and a more favorable grade distribution.
  • Clinical skills improved across five core procedures, with significant gains in metal preformed crown restoration (excellent from 26% to 34%) and primary tooth pulpectomy (fail from 5% to 1%).
  • Students reported enhanced learning motivation, clinical confidence, and professional skills with the new model.
  • Feedback indicated a need for more digital practice time and better equipment access.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background Project-driven learning and digital technologies have become increasingly essential in dental education to bridge the gap between theoretical instruction and clinical practice. Traditional teaching in the comparator cohort relied primarily on lectures, laboratory simulation, and clinical observation, whereas the intervention cohort received an integrated project-driven model combining offline instruction, chairside clinical exposure, and digital workflows. This study aimed to evaluate the educational outcomes associated with this integrated teaching model in undergraduate pediatric dentistry. Methods A controlled quasi-experimental study was conducted among 246 fourth-year dental students from the 2020–2021 cohorts at the Xi'an Jiaotong University, Air Force Military Medical University and Xuzhou Medical University. The 2020-entry cohort received traditional instruction in 2024 ( n = 121), whereas the 2021-entry cohort received the three-step teaching method in 2025 ( n = 125). The intervention incorporated two clinical projects involving digitally designed and 3D-printed space maintainers and metal splints. Course scores, clinical performance, self-reported proficiency, and student feedback were compared between cohorts. Results The 2021 cohort achieved higher overall course grades (88 vs. 85) and a numerically more favorable grade distribution, with higher rates of “excellent” (13% vs. 7%) and “good” (45% vs. 42%) and lower “fail” (4% vs. 5%). Clinical skills performance improved across all five core procedures, with the most notable improvements in metal preformed crown restoration (excellent from 26% to 34%) and pulpectomy of primary teeth (fail from 5% to 1%). Student feedback indicated that the three-step method improved learning motivation, clinical confidence, and professional skills, while also identifying the need for more digital practice time and better equipment access. Conclusion The project-driven offline–chairside–digital teaching model was associated with improved clinical performance, learning outcomes, and student engagement in undergraduate pediatric dentistry education. This approach may provide an effective framework for integrating project-based learning and digital dentistry within competency-based curricula.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Education, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Dentistry

General DentistryDentistry