HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal· 2026Q2
Standardization in Healthcare Environments: A Scoping Review
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Standardization in healthcare facility design is largely theoretical, with few studies empirically evaluating its outcomes, according to a scoping review of 28 articles.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Standardization in healthcare facility design is primarily theoretical, with limited empirical evaluation of its outcomes.
- Potential benefits include reduced cognitive workload, improved workflow efficiency, and enhanced safety.
- Implementation challenges include healthcare complexity, resistance from clinicians, and lack of system integration.
- The current literature lacks a consistent definition or taxonomy of standardization in healthcare.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background Healthcare systems are complex environments, and standardization is often viewed as a strategy to streamline complexity, reduce variability, improve patient safety, and enhance operational efficiency. While standardization has proven effective in industries such as aviation, nuclear plants, and manufacturing, its applicability in healthcare for its intended outcomes remains fundamentally contested . Additionally, current literature lacks a consistent definition or taxonomy of standardization in healthcare facility design. This creates conceptual ambiguity in both research and practice. Objective The aim of the scoping review is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the role of standardization in the healthcare-built environment, specifically focusing on inpatient settings, by examining how it has been studied and applied across healthcare settings. Method This review systematically searched peer-reviewed literature using the PRISMA-Scr structured framework to identify studies examining standardization in the healthcare-built environment. The review examined five databases using the Population, Concept, and Context framework, which guided keyword selection. Results The review included 28 articles and analyzed the aspects of standardization that have been studied, the rationale for its application, the implementation approach, and reported positive and negative outcomes across inpatient settings. Conclusions The findings suggest that the approach of standardization remains theoretical and conceptual, with very few studies empirically evaluating its outcomes. The existing literature suggests that standardization can reduce cognitive workload, improve workflow efficiency, and enhance safety when aligned with clinical processes and organizational culture. However, its implementation is challenged by the complexity and variability of healthcare delivery practices, resistance related to clinical autonomy, and limited integration across systems.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Medical Laboratory TechnologyHealth Professions