Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy· 2026Q1
Navicular fractures in elite athletes: Clarifying the evidence base of the 2025 International Foot and Ankle Sports Consensus
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A re-analysis of a systematic review on elite athletes' navicular fractures reveals a mean return-to-sport (RTS) time of 19.7 weeks after surgery, not the reported 8.2 weeks, due to a unit extraction error. The review also included studies outside its stated eligibility criteria.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Mean return-to-sport (RTS) time after operative navicular fracture treatment in elite athletes is approximately 19.7 weeks, not 8.2 weeks as previously reported.
- The discrepancy in RTS time is attributed to an error in extracting and converting time units from the original studies.
- Five of the 14 included studies violated the 15-year publication window eligibility criterion.
- At least four studies included cohorts with a mean age below 18, contradicting the exclusion of pediatric studies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The recent international foot and ankle sports consensus and systematic review on navicular fractures in elite athletes addresses a highly relevant and challenging topic in sports medicine and provides valuable guidance in an area where standardized treatment and return to sport (RTS) recommendations remain limited. However, several methodological and reporting issues within the systematic review warrant clarification, given their potential influence on RTS decision-making. The reported mean RTS time of 8.2 weeks after operative treatment of navicular stress fractures appears to result from an error in the extraction of time units. Recalculation based on the included studies, after converting all values to weeks, yields a mean RTS of approximately 19.7 weeks (4.5 months), consistent with the expert consensus recommendation of 4-6 months after surgery. Further discrepancies concern the application of the stated eligibility criteria: 5 of the 14 included studies were published outside the specified 15-year window, and at least four involved cohorts with a mean age below 18 years despite paediatric studies being listed as an exclusion criterion. Further inconsistencies in study classification and reporting add to these concerns. We believe that clarification of these concerns is essential to ensure the reliability of the evidence base informing the consensus recommendations and to support accurate guidance for RTS decision-making in elite athletes with navicular fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports MedicineMedicine