PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Neonatal Screening· 2026Q1

Parental Perceptions and Decision-Making Processes Regarding Expanded Newborn Screening: A Qualitative Study

Masashi Harazaki, Yuka Wada, Mami Notake, Naoki Takabayashi et al.

Short summary

Parents who accepted expanded newborn screening (eNBS) struggled to understand rare diseases, while both acceptors and decliners interpreted screening programs based on personal experiences and cost perceptions, leading to varied decisions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Parents found unfamiliar rare diseases in expanded newborn screening (eNBS) difficult to understand.
  • Personal experiences and perceptions of screening costs influenced parental decisions on eNBS.
  • Interpretations of eNBS varied between parents who accepted and those who declined screening.
  • 24 mothers were interviewed using semi-structured interviews and data analyzed via reflexive thematic analysis.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) has expanded in scope owing to technological advances and the development of novel therapies. In Japan, coverage of standard NBS is nearly 100%; however, uptake of expanded newborn bloodspot screening (eNBS), which has been increasingly introduced across many regions of the country in recent years, varies across municipalities and healthcare institutions. To explore parental perspectives on eNBS, we conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with mothers of newborns delivered at Shizuoka General Hospital. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Stratified purposive sampling based on eNBS uptake was used to recruit both parents who accepted and those who declined eNBS, resulting in 24 participants. Three main themes were identified: (1) difficulty understanding unfamiliar rare diseases; (2) subjective interpretation based on personal experiences; and (3) perceptions of screening programs and associated costs. These themes suggested a sequential interpretive process; however, interpretations of the latter two themes varied between participants who accepted and those who declined eNBS. To support informed parental decision-making regarding eNBS and reduce barriers to screening among those who accept it, efforts should include communication tailored to parents’ information needs, measures to prevent social disadvantage and discrimination associated with early identification of disease, and consideration of public financial support.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Clinical Biochemistry

Clinical BiochemistryBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology