PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Mindfulness· 2026Q1· Review

Bridging the Gap Between Contemporary and Buddhist Definitions of Mindfulness: A Scoping Review

ZiYoung Kang, Youngdon Choi, Gun Ahn, Lincoln Blackwell et al.

Short summary

A scoping review of 120 articles proposes an integrative process model of mindfulness, reconciling contemporary and Buddhist conceptualizations by identifying four complementary components: sound awareness, discerning awareness and wise judgment, choice and action guided by wise judgment, and heedfulness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Buddhist mindfulness is characterized by ethical orientation, liberating self-transformation, discerning awareness, wise judgment, interconnected practices, and heedfulness.
  • Contemporary and Buddhist mindfulness definitions, while divergent, can be integrated into a unified model.
  • The proposed integrative model consists of four components: sound awareness, discerning awareness and wise judgment, choice and action guided by wise judgment, and heedfulness.
  • This model reconciles differences by viewing them as complementary aspects of a comprehensive mindfulness process.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Divergent definitions of mindfulness complicate the interpretation of mindfulness-based intervention research. Some scholars suggest that incorporating insights from historical models of mindfulness in Buddhism may further enhance the benefits of mindfulness practices. Although these recommendations converge on some points, they diverge on others, warranting systematic examination. Objectives The present review identifies commonly discussed differences between contemporary and Buddhist conceptualizations and synthesizes them into an integrative model of mindfulness. Method A scoping review using database searches identified relevant publications in peer-reviewed journals ranked in the top quartile according to SCImago Journal Rank. Excerpts from 120 articles comparing contemporary and Buddhist conceptualizations of mindfulness were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results Four categories were identified, indicating that the reviewed literature commonly characterizes Buddhist conceptualizations of mindfulness as (a) oriented toward ethical behavior and liberating self-transformation; (b) involving discerning awareness and wise judgment informed by recollection and insight; (c) inseparable from an interconnected system of practices; and (d) involving heedfulness and vigilant guarding of the mind, remembering one’s intentions. Conclusions By revisiting and integrating these differences, we propose, as an interpretive synthesis of these contrasts, a process model of mindfulness consisting of four components: (a) sound awareness (non-judgmental awareness), (b) discerning awareness and wise judgment, (c) choice and action guided by wise judgment, and (d) heedfulness. Rather than interpreting contemporary and Buddhist conceptualizations as incompatible, the model incorporates the differences as complementary components within a unified account. Preregistration : This review’s protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4W7DF ).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Mindfulness, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Clinical Psychology

Clinical PsychologyPsychology