Journal of International Relations and Development· 2026Q1
Analysing China’s South-South cooperation discourse in the United Nations
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
China's discourse on South-South Cooperation (SSC) at the UN frames it as a morally legitimate, dynamic framework complementary to North-South cooperation, serving as a foreign policy identity project to balance its growing power with its developing country status.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- China's UN discourse on SSC frames it as dynamic and morally legitimate, avoiding exact operational definitions.
- SSC is presented as complementary to North-South cooperation, not a replacement.
- SSC serves as a foreign policy identity project for China, balancing power with developing country status.
- Analysis is based on 112 English-language statements by China's Permanent Mission to the UN (2000-2024).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The resurgence of South–South Cooperation (SSC) has reignited debates in International Relations about hierarchy, identity, and change in the global development order. While existing scholarship on China’s development cooperation has primarily focused on material practices and outcomes, this article examines China’s navigation through SSC as a discursive space for identity formation within multilateral institutions. Using a constructivist approach, the article analyses China’s SSC discourse at the United Nations through qualitative, inductive discourse analysis. The study draws on 112 English-language statements and speeches issued by China’s Permanent Mission to the UN from 2000 to 2024 that explicitly mention South–South cooperation. The analysis reveals that China consistently portrays SSC as a dynamic and morally legitimate framework while deliberately avoiding exact operational definitions. SSC is discursively positioned as complementary to, rather than a replacement for, North–South cooperation, thus reaffirming the historical duties of developed countries while legitimising China’s own development efforts. The findings further show that SSC functions as a foreign policy identity project through which China balances its growing material power with its ongoing self-identification as a developing country and a representative of the Global South. By emphasising discourse as a key factor in development politics, the article adds to IR debates on social construction, identity, and gradual normative change within global development governance.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of International Relations and Development, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Development
DevelopmentSocial Sciences