The Journal of Development Studies· 2026Q1
Beyond Partnership Quantity: A Meso-Level Framework for Effective External Cooperation in International Development Organisations
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new meso-level framework identifies six dimensions—policy convergence, instrumental complementarity, authority diffusion, institutional learning, joint action, and relational capital—that explain why the quantity of cooperation agreements in development organizations doesn't reliably predict outcomes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The quantity of cooperation agreements in development organizations does not consistently correlate with improved development outcomes.
- A meso-level analysis, focusing on the HQ-regional office interface, is crucial for understanding cooperation effectiveness.
- The framework includes two enabling conditions (policy convergence, instrumental complementarity) and two failure mechanisms (authority diffusion, institutional learning deficits).
- Formalized joint action frameworks and relational capital are identified as key design solutions for effective cooperation.
- Institutionalized arrangements balance enabling conditions with controlled authority diffusion, while resource commitment is vital for collaboration initiation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
International development organisations have never maintained more formal cooperation agreements, yet the relationship between partnership quantity and development outcomes remains empirically inconclusive. This article argues that explaining this gap requires shifting the unit of analysis from the system level to the meso level: the interface between organisational headquarters and regional offices where cooperation is designed and governed. Drawing on international organisation theory, the aid effectiveness literature, and scholarship on IO field presence, it develops a six-dimensional diagnostic framework comprising two enabling conditions (policy-domain convergence and instrumental complementarity), two failure mechanisms (authority diffusion and institutional learning deficits), and two design solutions (formalised joint action frameworks and relational capital). The framework is operationalised through observable indicators and applied in a structured, focused comparison of ten peer-organisation arrangements maintained by an OECD regional centre in Asia, alongside contrast cases that never reach institutionalisation. Institutionalised arrangements combine strong enabling conditions with limited authority-diffusion frictions; many proposed collaborations dissolve at the formation stage because no organisation commits resources; and formalisation and relational capital can operate as partial substitutes once repeated interaction stabilises expectations. The article contributes a meso-level framework and practical structural-quality indicators for cooperation design.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Journal of Development Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Development
DevelopmentSocial Sciences