PofoliaShared via Pofolia

South African Journal of African Languages· 2026Q1

Investigating the non-compliance with language policy-related frameworks by government departments in South Africa

Bongane I Chauke, Yanga L.P. Majola, Tebogo Jacob Rakgogo

Short summary

South African government departments show critical non-compliance with multilingualism policies, driven by competing priorities, budget limits, and lack of inter-agency collaboration, with no legal consequences for non-compliance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Government departments in South Africa are not adequately implementing language policy frameworks.
  • Key barriers include competing government priorities, budget limitations, and lack of collaboration between language bodies.
  • There are no legal consequences for non-compliance with language policies due to a lack of enforceable sanctions.
  • This non-compliance perpetuates the marginalization of Indigenous languages.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Despite South Africa’s progressive constitutional and legislative frameworks for multilingualism, the implementation of language policy-related frameworks by government departments is critically inadequate. This study explored the reasons for ongoing non-compliance and investigated the implications thereof. Existing literature acknowledges progressive language policies but lacks research on systemic implementation failures and accountability deficits. The study identifies barriers to effective policy implementation and determines the legal and practical consequences of non-compliance. Using a qualitative approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with officials from the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture, the Pan South African Language Board and the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities. Thematic analysis revealed that effective monitoring and evaluation are undermined by competing government priorities, budgetary constraints and a lack of collaboration between language bodies. Critically, the study found no legal consequences for non-compliance, as language policies lack enforceable sanctions. This absence of punitive measures perpetuates the marginalisation of Indigenous languages and prevents them from achieving equal linguistic status. The study recommends that punitive measures for non-compliance be constitutionally enshrined and that responsibilities be more clearly demarcated between language authorities.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. South African Journal of African Languages, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences