Mobilities· 2026Q1
Rethinking postcolonial mobilities through literature
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Literature offers a richer understanding of postcolonial mobilities than traditional scholarship by engaging with their material, multiple, and relational dimensions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Literature can provide a more nuanced understanding of postcolonial mobilities than current postcolonial literary scholarship.
- Many analyses of 'mobility' in postcolonial studies are metaphorical or focus on outcomes, often equating mobility solely with migration.
- Contemporary postcolonial literature, including travelogues and road novels, diversifies discussions on mobility thematically and formally.
- Literary texts engage with the material, multiple, and relational dimensions of mobility in the global aftermath of colonialism.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Inspired by research that positions literary texts as capable of contributing to theoretical discussions on mobility, this article argues that literature can enable a deeper understanding of postcolonial mobilities than mainstream postcolonial literary scholarship. Although there are signs of increasing dialogue between postcolonial studies and mobilities theory, many analyses of ‘mobility’ within the field are not, strictly speaking, about mobility as such. Rather, there remains a tendency to approach mobilities metaphorically or in terms of their outcomes, as well as to equate mobility with migration in ways that disconnect it from other categories of mobility. This article addresses these tendencies while also mapping out recent developments in the study of postcolonial literary mobilities. Drawing on contemporary postcolonial literature – a travelogue by Emmanuel Iduma, a road novel by Max Lobe, and a work of narrative non-fiction by Khalid Lyamlahy – the article demonstrates how literary texts diversify discussions about postcolonial mobilities, both thematically and through their form. It approaches the texts less as objects of detailed close reading than as catalysts for theoretical thinking and argues that, unlike much postcolonial literary scholarship, they engage with the material, multiple, and relational dimensions of mobility in the global aftermath of colonialism.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Mobilities, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Literature and Literary Theory
Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities